A Comparative Analysis of Maize and Winter Wheat LAI Retrieval Using Spectral and Texture Features from Sentinel-2A Image.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Comparative Analysis of Maize and Winter Wheat LAI Retrieval Using Spectral and Texture Features from Sentinel-2A Image.
Authors: Zhang, Yangyang1 (AUTHOR), Han, Xu1,2 (AUTHOR), Yang, Jian1,2 (AUTHOR) yangjian@cug.edu.cn
Source: Remote Sensing. May2026, Vol. 18 Issue 10, p1561. 20p.
Subjects: Leaf area index, Winter wheat, Surface texture, Reflectance, Vegetation monitoring, Corn
Abstract: Highlights: What are the main findings? Red-edge based vegetation indices and mean texture features are robust LAI predictors for both winter wheat and maize, but their relative importance varies by crop. A comparative analysis reveals that optimal texture index combinations are highly crop-specific (e.g., combinations involving variance for wheat vs. contrast for maize), reflecting differences in canopy structure. What are the implications of the main findings? The study demonstrates that while multi-feature fusion improves accuracy, there is no universal model for different crops; strategies must be adapted to specific canopy architectures. This study highlights the necessity of crop-adaptive feature selection—the two-stage optimization significantly boosts accuracy for uniform canopies (wheat) but yields limited gains for heterogeneous canopies (maize), guiding future method development. The leaf area index (LAI) is a key parameter reflecting vegetation canopy structure and growth status. This study systematically compares the performance of spectral and texture features derived from Sentinel-2A imagery for LAI retrieval in winter wheat and maize. Multiple vegetation indices and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture features were extracted, and three types of texture indices—Normalized Difference Texture Index (NDTI), Ratio Texture Index (RTI), and Difference Texture Index (DTI)—were constructed. Modeling was performed using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). Results show that red-edge vegetation indices and mean texture features (e.g., NDVI_M) are robust predictors for both crops, with correlation coefficients reaching 0.87 for winter wheat and 0.83 for maize. Texture indices further enhance the representation of canopy structural information; the optimal NDTI achieved |R| > 0.88 for both crops, though the specific feature pairs were crop-specific. Using the proposed two-stage feature optimization strategy combined with GPR, the LAI estimation accuracy for winter wheat reached R2 = 0.87 with RMSE = 0.41 on an independent test set, while for maize the accuracy was R2 = 0.75 with RMSE = 0.38. The strategy significantly improved accuracy for winter wheat (uniform canopy) but yielded limited gains for maize (heterogeneous canopy), largely due to differences in canopy architecture. This study demonstrates that integrating multi-dimensional features with nonlinear modeling enhances LAI estimation accuracy. By providing a side-by-side comparative evaluation across two contrasting crop canopies, this study underscores the necessity of crop-adaptive feature selection and modeling strategies. The findings offer practical guidance rather than a universal model for large-scale crop monitoring in agricultural remote sensing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Remote Sensing is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 194141086
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A Comparative Analysis of Maize and Winter Wheat LAI Retrieval Using Spectral and Texture Features from Sentinel-2A Image.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zhang%2C+Yangyang%22">Zhang, Yangyang</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Han%2C+Xu%22">Han, Xu</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yang%2C+Jian%22">Yang, Jian</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> yangjian@cug.edu.cn</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Remote+Sensing%22">Remote Sensing</searchLink>. May2026, Vol. 18 Issue 10, p1561. 20p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Leaf+area+index%22">Leaf area index</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Winter+wheat%22">Winter wheat</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surface+texture%22">Surface texture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflectance%22">Reflectance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vegetation+monitoring%22">Vegetation monitoring</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Corn%22">Corn</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Highlights: What are the main findings? Red-edge based vegetation indices and mean texture features are robust LAI predictors for both winter wheat and maize, but their relative importance varies by crop. A comparative analysis reveals that optimal texture index combinations are highly crop-specific (e.g., combinations involving variance for wheat vs. contrast for maize), reflecting differences in canopy structure. What are the implications of the main findings? The study demonstrates that while multi-feature fusion improves accuracy, there is no universal model for different crops; strategies must be adapted to specific canopy architectures. This study highlights the necessity of crop-adaptive feature selection—the two-stage optimization significantly boosts accuracy for uniform canopies (wheat) but yields limited gains for heterogeneous canopies (maize), guiding future method development. The leaf area index (LAI) is a key parameter reflecting vegetation canopy structure and growth status. This study systematically compares the performance of spectral and texture features derived from Sentinel-2A imagery for LAI retrieval in winter wheat and maize. Multiple vegetation indices and gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) texture features were extracted, and three types of texture indices—Normalized Difference Texture Index (NDTI), Ratio Texture Index (RTI), and Difference Texture Index (DTI)—were constructed. Modeling was performed using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR). Results show that red-edge vegetation indices and mean texture features (e.g., NDVI_M) are robust predictors for both crops, with correlation coefficients reaching 0.87 for winter wheat and 0.83 for maize. Texture indices further enhance the representation of canopy structural information; the optimal NDTI achieved |R| > 0.88 for both crops, though the specific feature pairs were crop-specific. Using the proposed two-stage feature optimization strategy combined with GPR, the LAI estimation accuracy for winter wheat reached R2 = 0.87 with RMSE = 0.41 on an independent test set, while for maize the accuracy was R2 = 0.75 with RMSE = 0.38. The strategy significantly improved accuracy for winter wheat (uniform canopy) but yielded limited gains for maize (heterogeneous canopy), largely due to differences in canopy architecture. This study demonstrates that integrating multi-dimensional features with nonlinear modeling enhances LAI estimation accuracy. By providing a side-by-side comparative evaluation across two contrasting crop canopies, this study underscores the necessity of crop-adaptive feature selection and modeling strategies. The findings offer practical guidance rather than a universal model for large-scale crop monitoring in agricultural remote sensing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Remote Sensing is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=194141086
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.3390/rs18101561
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 1561
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Leaf area index
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Winter wheat
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surface texture
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reflectance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Vegetation monitoring
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Corn
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A Comparative Analysis of Maize and Winter Wheat LAI Retrieval Using Spectral and Texture Features from Sentinel-2A Image.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zhang, Yangyang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Han, Xu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yang, Jian
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 15
              M: 05
              Text: May2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 20724292
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 18
            – Type: issue
              Value: 10
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Remote Sensing
              Type: main
ResultId 1