Biomechanical Behavior of Different Framework and Superstructure Material Combinations in Two-Implant-Supported Four-Unit Prostheses: A Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Biomechanical Behavior of Different Framework and Superstructure Material Combinations in Two-Implant-Supported Four-Unit Prostheses: A Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.
Authors: Hajghani, Niloofar1 (AUTHOR) niloofar.ghani@neu.edu.tr, Günal-Abdulcelil, Burcu1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Materials (1996-1944). Jun2026, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p2376. 18p.
Subjects: Finite element method, Dynamic loads, Biomechanics, Dental materials, Mechanical behavior of materials, Prosthetics, Stress concentration, Construction materials
Abstract: The long-term success of implant-supported prostheses (ISPs) is strongly influenced by material selection, which affects stress distribution within the implant system and surrounding cortical bone. This study aimed to assess the biomechanical behavior of a four-unit ISP supported by two implants in the posterior region, using different framework and superstructure material combinations through dynamic finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: A three-dimensional (3D) edentulous mandibular model was created using Mimics software, with two implants placed in the first premolar and second molar regions. Four framework materials—titanium (Ti), glass fiber–reinforced composite (GFRC), 3Y-TZP zirconia, and polyether ether ketone (PEEK)—were combined with two superstructure materials, 5Y-TZP zirconia and resin-matrix ceramic (RMC), forming eight groups. Dynamic loading simulated chewing forces, and stress distribution was analyzed using the von Mises criterion. Results: The results demonstrated that 3Y-TZP zirconia frameworks generated the highest stress values across implants, abutments, and cortical bone. RMC crowns consistently produced lower stress than 5Y-TZP zirconia across all the groups. PEEK showed the highest displacement, followed by GFRC, zirconia, and Ti. Conclusion: Materials with higher Young's modulus tended to exhibit greater stress transfer to the implant, implant components, and cortical bone. In contrast, polymer-based materials may show a tendency toward greater deformation and displacement compared with metallic and ceramic materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Materials (1996-1944) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 194587287
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Biomechanical Behavior of Different Framework and Superstructure Material Combinations in Two-Implant-Supported Four-Unit Prostheses: A Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hajghani%2C+Niloofar%22">Hajghani, Niloofar</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> niloofar.ghani@neu.edu.tr</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Günal-Abdulcelil%2C+Burcu%22">Günal-Abdulcelil, Burcu</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Materials+%281996-1944%29%22">Materials (1996-1944)</searchLink>. Jun2026, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p2376. 18p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Finite+element+method%22">Finite element method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dynamic+loads%22">Dynamic loads</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biomechanics%22">Biomechanics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dental+materials%22">Dental materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mechanical+behavior+of+materials%22">Mechanical behavior of materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prosthetics%22">Prosthetics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stress+concentration%22">Stress concentration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Construction+materials%22">Construction materials</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The long-term success of implant-supported prostheses (ISPs) is strongly influenced by material selection, which affects stress distribution within the implant system and surrounding cortical bone. This study aimed to assess the biomechanical behavior of a four-unit ISP supported by two implants in the posterior region, using different framework and superstructure material combinations through dynamic finite element analysis (FEA). Methods: A three-dimensional (3D) edentulous mandibular model was created using Mimics software, with two implants placed in the first premolar and second molar regions. Four framework materials—titanium (Ti), glass fiber–reinforced composite (GFRC), 3Y-TZP zirconia, and polyether ether ketone (PEEK)—were combined with two superstructure materials, 5Y-TZP zirconia and resin-matrix ceramic (RMC), forming eight groups. Dynamic loading simulated chewing forces, and stress distribution was analyzed using the von Mises criterion. Results: The results demonstrated that 3Y-TZP zirconia frameworks generated the highest stress values across implants, abutments, and cortical bone. RMC crowns consistently produced lower stress than 5Y-TZP zirconia across all the groups. PEEK showed the highest displacement, followed by GFRC, zirconia, and Ti. Conclusion: Materials with higher Young's modulus tended to exhibit greater stress transfer to the implant, implant components, and cortical bone. In contrast, polymer-based materials may show a tendency toward greater deformation and displacement compared with metallic and ceramic materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Materials (1996-1944) is the property of MDPI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=194587287
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.3390/ma19112376
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 2376
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Finite element method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dynamic loads
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biomechanics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dental materials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mechanical behavior of materials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prosthetics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stress concentration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Construction materials
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Biomechanical Behavior of Different Framework and Superstructure Material Combinations in Two-Implant-Supported Four-Unit Prostheses: A Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hajghani, Niloofar
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Günal-Abdulcelil, Burcu
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 19961944
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 19
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Materials (1996-1944)
              Type: main
ResultId 1