Mechanisms of academic stress affecting AI-assisted cheating behaviour in college students: a mixed methods study.
Saved in:
| Title: | Mechanisms of academic stress affecting AI-assisted cheating behaviour in college students: a mixed methods study. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Wang, Guohua1,2 (AUTHOR) wgh19892008@126.com, Tian, Lianghao1 (AUTHOR), Xing, Xueru1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Interactive Learning Environments. Jul2026, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p3358-3372. 15p. |
| Subjects: | Academic fraud, Student cheating, Overpressure (Education), Planned behavior theory, Generative artificial intelligence, College students, Mixed methods research, Self-efficacy |
| Abstract: | The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has provided college students with tools to mitigate academic stress but has also facilitated AI-assisted cheating. However, existing research offers limited insight into how academic stress influences cheating behaviours and the underlying psychological mechanisms, leaving a significant gap in understanding. This study aims to develop and validate a theoretical model explaining how academic stress influences college students' intentions to engage in AI-assisted cheating. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this research employed a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were analysed to explore relationships among academic stress, academic self-efficacy, attitudes toward AI-assisted cheating, and cheating intentions. A survey analyzed 458 valid questionnaires from students, while follow-up qualitative interviews with 21 students who admitted to using AI to assist in cheating provided in-depth analysis. Findings indicate that academic stress directly influences students' AI-assisted cheating intentions and indirectly does so through academic self-efficacy and attitudes as mediators. Qualitative interviews reinforced these findings by offering contextual explanations. This study reveals both direct and indirect pathways linking academic stress to AI-assisted cheating, contributing to a deeper theoretical and practical understanding of academic misconduct in the GAI era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Interactive Learning Environments is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 195034511 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Mechanisms of academic stress affecting AI-assisted cheating behaviour in college students: a mixed methods study. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Guohua%22">Wang, Guohua</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> wgh19892008@126.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tian%2C+Lianghao%22">Tian, Lianghao</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xing%2C+Xueru%22">Xing, Xueru</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Interactive+Learning+Environments%22">Interactive Learning Environments</searchLink>. Jul2026, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p3358-3372. 15p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+fraud%22">Academic fraud</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+cheating%22">Student cheating</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Overpressure+%28Education%29%22">Overpressure (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Planned+behavior+theory%22">Planned behavior theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Generative+artificial+intelligence%22">Generative artificial intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+students%22">College students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mixed+methods+research%22">Mixed methods research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-efficacy%22">Self-efficacy</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has provided college students with tools to mitigate academic stress but has also facilitated AI-assisted cheating. However, existing research offers limited insight into how academic stress influences cheating behaviours and the underlying psychological mechanisms, leaving a significant gap in understanding. This study aims to develop and validate a theoretical model explaining how academic stress influences college students' intentions to engage in AI-assisted cheating. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this research employed a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were analysed to explore relationships among academic stress, academic self-efficacy, attitudes toward AI-assisted cheating, and cheating intentions. A survey analyzed 458 valid questionnaires from students, while follow-up qualitative interviews with 21 students who admitted to using AI to assist in cheating provided in-depth analysis. Findings indicate that academic stress directly influences students' AI-assisted cheating intentions and indirectly does so through academic self-efficacy and attitudes as mediators. Qualitative interviews reinforced these findings by offering contextual explanations. This study reveals both direct and indirect pathways linking academic stress to AI-assisted cheating, contributing to a deeper theoretical and practical understanding of academic misconduct in the GAI era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Interactive Learning Environments is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=195034511 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2565684 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 3358 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Academic fraud Type: general – SubjectFull: Student cheating Type: general – SubjectFull: Overpressure (Education) Type: general – SubjectFull: Planned behavior theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Generative artificial intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: College students Type: general – SubjectFull: Mixed methods research Type: general – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Mechanisms of academic stress affecting AI-assisted cheating behaviour in college students: a mixed methods study. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wang, Guohua – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tian, Lianghao – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Xing, Xueru IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul2026 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10494820 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 34 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Interactive Learning Environments Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |