Mechanisms of academic stress affecting AI-assisted cheating behaviour in college students: a mixed methods study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Mechanisms of academic stress affecting AI-assisted cheating behaviour in college students: a mixed methods study.
Authors: Wang, Guohua1,2 (AUTHOR) wgh19892008@126.com, Tian, Lianghao1 (AUTHOR), Xing, Xueru1 (AUTHOR)
Source: Interactive Learning Environments. Jul2026, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p3358-3372. 15p.
Subjects: Academic fraud, Student cheating, Overpressure (Education), Planned behavior theory, Generative artificial intelligence, College students, Mixed methods research, Self-efficacy
Abstract: The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has provided college students with tools to mitigate academic stress but has also facilitated AI-assisted cheating. However, existing research offers limited insight into how academic stress influences cheating behaviours and the underlying psychological mechanisms, leaving a significant gap in understanding. This study aims to develop and validate a theoretical model explaining how academic stress influences college students' intentions to engage in AI-assisted cheating. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this research employed a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were analysed to explore relationships among academic stress, academic self-efficacy, attitudes toward AI-assisted cheating, and cheating intentions. A survey analyzed 458 valid questionnaires from students, while follow-up qualitative interviews with 21 students who admitted to using AI to assist in cheating provided in-depth analysis. Findings indicate that academic stress directly influences students' AI-assisted cheating intentions and indirectly does so through academic self-efficacy and attitudes as mediators. Qualitative interviews reinforced these findings by offering contextual explanations. This study reveals both direct and indirect pathways linking academic stress to AI-assisted cheating, contributing to a deeper theoretical and practical understanding of academic misconduct in the GAI era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Interactive Learning Environments is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 195034511
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Mechanisms of academic stress affecting AI-assisted cheating behaviour in college students: a mixed methods study.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wang%2C+Guohua%22">Wang, Guohua</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> wgh19892008@126.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tian%2C+Lianghao%22">Tian, Lianghao</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Xing%2C+Xueru%22">Xing, Xueru</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Interactive+Learning+Environments%22">Interactive Learning Environments</searchLink>. Jul2026, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p3358-3372. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+fraud%22">Academic fraud</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+cheating%22">Student cheating</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Overpressure+%28Education%29%22">Overpressure (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Planned+behavior+theory%22">Planned behavior theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Generative+artificial+intelligence%22">Generative artificial intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+students%22">College students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mixed+methods+research%22">Mixed methods research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-efficacy%22">Self-efficacy</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) has provided college students with tools to mitigate academic stress but has also facilitated AI-assisted cheating. However, existing research offers limited insight into how academic stress influences cheating behaviours and the underlying psychological mechanisms, leaving a significant gap in understanding. This study aims to develop and validate a theoretical model explaining how academic stress influences college students' intentions to engage in AI-assisted cheating. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), this research employed a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were analysed to explore relationships among academic stress, academic self-efficacy, attitudes toward AI-assisted cheating, and cheating intentions. A survey analyzed 458 valid questionnaires from students, while follow-up qualitative interviews with 21 students who admitted to using AI to assist in cheating provided in-depth analysis. Findings indicate that academic stress directly influences students' AI-assisted cheating intentions and indirectly does so through academic self-efficacy and attitudes as mediators. Qualitative interviews reinforced these findings by offering contextual explanations. This study reveals both direct and indirect pathways linking academic stress to AI-assisted cheating, contributing to a deeper theoretical and practical understanding of academic misconduct in the GAI era. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Interactive Learning Environments is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=195034511
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/10494820.2025.2565684
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 3358
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Academic fraud
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student cheating
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Overpressure (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Planned behavior theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Generative artificial intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mixed methods research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-efficacy
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Mechanisms of academic stress affecting AI-assisted cheating behaviour in college students: a mixed methods study.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wang, Guohua
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tian, Lianghao
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Xing, Xueru
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Text: Jul2026
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10494820
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 34
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Interactive Learning Environments
              Type: main
ResultId 1