Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Beyer, F.1 beyerf@uni-muenster.de, Zierott, L.1, Fallenberg, E.1,2, Juergens, K.1, Stoeckel, J.3, Heindel, W.1, Wormanns, D.1,4, Fallenberg, E M (AUTHOR), Juergens, K U (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | European Radiology. Nov2007, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p2941-2947. 7p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 5 Graphs. |
| Subjects: | Lung diseases, Tomography, Radiologists, Medical radiography, Quantitative research, Artificial intelligence, Comparative studies, Computed tomography, Diagnostic errors, Diagnostic imaging, Longitudinal method, Lung tumors, Research methodology, Medical cooperation, Computers in medicine, Research, Research evaluation, Time, Task performance, Evaluation research, Research bias, Retrospective studies, Solitary pulmonary nodule, Equipment & supplies |
| Abstract: | The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules in MDCT scans and reading time of radiologists when using CAD as the second reader (SR) respectively concurrent reader (CR). Four radiologists analyzed 50 chest MDCT scans chosen from clinical routine two times and marked all detected pulmonary nodules: first with CAD as CR (display of CAD results immediately in the reading session) and later (median 14 weeks) with CAD as SR (display of CAD markers after completion of first reading without CAD). A Siemens LungCAD prototype was used. Sensitivities for detection of nodules and reading times were recorded. Sensitivity of reading with CAD as SR was significantly higher than reading without CAD (p < 0.001) and CAD as CR (p < 0.001). For nodule size of 1.75 mm or above no significant sensitivity difference between CAD as CR and reading without CAD was observed; e.g., for nodules above 4 mm sensitivity was 68% without CAD, 68% with CAD as CR (p = 0.45) and 75% with CAD as SR (p < 0.001). Reading time was significantly shorter for CR (274 s) compared to reading without CAD (294 s; p = 0.04) and SR (337 s; p < 0.001). In our study CAD could either speed up reading of chest CT cases for pulmonary nodules without relevant loss of sensitivity when used as CR, or it increased sensitivity at the cost of longer reading times when used as SR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 27004249 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Beyer%2C+F%2E%22">Beyer, F.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> beyerf@uni-muenster.de</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zierott%2C+L%2E%22">Zierott, L.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fallenberg%2C+E%2E%22">Fallenberg, E.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Juergens%2C+K%2E%22">Juergens, K.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stoeckel%2C+J%2E%22">Stoeckel, J.</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heindel%2C+W%2E%22">Heindel, W.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wormanns%2C+D%2E%22">Wormanns, D.</searchLink><relatesTo>1,4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fallenberg%2C+E+M%22">Fallenberg, E M</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Juergens%2C+K+U%22">Juergens, K U</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22European+Radiology%22">European Radiology</searchLink>. Nov2007, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p2941-2947. 7p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 5 Graphs. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lung+diseases%22">Lung diseases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tomography%22">Tomography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Radiologists%22">Radiologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+radiography%22">Medical radiography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quantitative+research%22">Quantitative research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+intelligence%22">Artificial intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computed+tomography%22">Computed tomography</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diagnostic+errors%22">Diagnostic errors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diagnostic+imaging%22">Diagnostic imaging</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lung+tumors%22">Lung tumors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+cooperation%22">Medical cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computers+in+medicine%22">Computers in medicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time%22">Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+performance%22">Task performance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+research%22">Evaluation research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+bias%22">Research bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Retrospective+studies%22">Retrospective studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Solitary+pulmonary+nodule%22">Solitary pulmonary nodule</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equipment+%26+supplies%22">Equipment & supplies</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules in MDCT scans and reading time of radiologists when using CAD as the second reader (SR) respectively concurrent reader (CR). Four radiologists analyzed 50 chest MDCT scans chosen from clinical routine two times and marked all detected pulmonary nodules: first with CAD as CR (display of CAD results immediately in the reading session) and later (median 14 weeks) with CAD as SR (display of CAD markers after completion of first reading without CAD). A Siemens LungCAD prototype was used. Sensitivities for detection of nodules and reading times were recorded. Sensitivity of reading with CAD as SR was significantly higher than reading without CAD (p < 0.001) and CAD as CR (p < 0.001). For nodule size of 1.75 mm or above no significant sensitivity difference between CAD as CR and reading without CAD was observed; e.g., for nodules above 4 mm sensitivity was 68% without CAD, 68% with CAD as CR (p = 0.45) and 75% with CAD as SR (p < 0.001). Reading time was significantly shorter for CR (274 s) compared to reading without CAD (294 s; p = 0.04) and SR (337 s; p < 0.001). In our study CAD could either speed up reading of chest CT cases for pulmonary nodules without relevant loss of sensitivity when used as CR, or it increased sensitivity at the cost of longer reading times when used as SR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=27004249 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s00330-007-0667-1 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 2941 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Lung diseases Type: general – SubjectFull: Tomography Type: general – SubjectFull: Radiologists Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical radiography Type: general – SubjectFull: Quantitative research Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Computed tomography Type: general – SubjectFull: Diagnostic errors Type: general – SubjectFull: Diagnostic imaging Type: general – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method Type: general – SubjectFull: Lung tumors Type: general – SubjectFull: Research methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical cooperation Type: general – SubjectFull: Computers in medicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Research evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Type: general – SubjectFull: Task performance Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation research Type: general – SubjectFull: Research bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Retrospective studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Solitary pulmonary nodule Type: general – SubjectFull: Equipment & supplies Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Beyer, F. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zierott, L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fallenberg, E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Juergens, K. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stoeckel, J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Heindel, W. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wormanns, D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fallenberg, E M – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Juergens, K U IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Text: Nov2007 Type: published Y: 2007 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 09387994 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 17 – Type: issue Value: 11 Titles: – TitleFull: European Radiology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |