Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader.
Authors: Beyer, F.1 beyerf@uni-muenster.de, Zierott, L.1, Fallenberg, E.1,2, Juergens, K.1, Stoeckel, J.3, Heindel, W.1, Wormanns, D.1,4, Fallenberg, E M (AUTHOR), Juergens, K U (AUTHOR)
Source: European Radiology. Nov2007, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p2941-2947. 7p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 5 Graphs.
Subjects: Lung diseases, Tomography, Radiologists, Medical radiography, Quantitative research, Artificial intelligence, Comparative studies, Computed tomography, Diagnostic errors, Diagnostic imaging, Longitudinal method, Lung tumors, Research methodology, Medical cooperation, Computers in medicine, Research, Research evaluation, Time, Task performance, Evaluation research, Research bias, Retrospective studies, Solitary pulmonary nodule, Equipment & supplies
Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules in MDCT scans and reading time of radiologists when using CAD as the second reader (SR) respectively concurrent reader (CR). Four radiologists analyzed 50 chest MDCT scans chosen from clinical routine two times and marked all detected pulmonary nodules: first with CAD as CR (display of CAD results immediately in the reading session) and later (median 14 weeks) with CAD as SR (display of CAD markers after completion of first reading without CAD). A Siemens LungCAD prototype was used. Sensitivities for detection of nodules and reading times were recorded. Sensitivity of reading with CAD as SR was significantly higher than reading without CAD (p < 0.001) and CAD as CR (p < 0.001). For nodule size of 1.75 mm or above no significant sensitivity difference between CAD as CR and reading without CAD was observed; e.g., for nodules above 4 mm sensitivity was 68% without CAD, 68% with CAD as CR (p = 0.45) and 75% with CAD as SR (p < 0.001). Reading time was significantly shorter for CR (274 s) compared to reading without CAD (294 s; p = 0.04) and SR (337 s; p < 0.001). In our study CAD could either speed up reading of chest CT cases for pulmonary nodules without relevant loss of sensitivity when used as CR, or it increased sensitivity at the cost of longer reading times when used as SR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 27004249
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Beyer%2C+F%2E%22&quot;&gt;Beyer, F.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;i&gt; beyerf@uni-muenster.de&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Zierott%2C+L%2E%22&quot;&gt;Zierott, L.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Fallenberg%2C+E%2E%22&quot;&gt;Fallenberg, E.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1,2&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Juergens%2C+K%2E%22&quot;&gt;Juergens, K.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Stoeckel%2C+J%2E%22&quot;&gt;Stoeckel, J.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Heindel%2C+W%2E%22&quot;&gt;Heindel, W.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Wormanns%2C+D%2E%22&quot;&gt;Wormanns, D.&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1,4&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Fallenberg%2C+E+M%22&quot;&gt;Fallenberg, E M&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Juergens%2C+K+U%22&quot;&gt;Juergens, K U&lt;/searchLink&gt; (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22European+Radiology%22&quot;&gt;European Radiology&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Nov2007, Vol. 17 Issue 11, p2941-2947. 7p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Black and White Photograph, 1 Diagram, 4 Charts, 5 Graphs.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Lung+diseases%22&quot;&gt;Lung diseases&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Tomography%22&quot;&gt;Tomography&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Radiologists%22&quot;&gt;Radiologists&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+radiography%22&quot;&gt;Medical radiography&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Quantitative+research%22&quot;&gt;Quantitative research&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Artificial+intelligence%22&quot;&gt;Artificial intelligence&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Comparative+studies%22&quot;&gt;Comparative studies&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Computed+tomography%22&quot;&gt;Computed tomography&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Diagnostic+errors%22&quot;&gt;Diagnostic errors&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Diagnostic+imaging%22&quot;&gt;Diagnostic imaging&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Longitudinal+method%22&quot;&gt;Longitudinal method&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Lung+tumors%22&quot;&gt;Lung tumors&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+methodology%22&quot;&gt;Research methodology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+cooperation%22&quot;&gt;Medical cooperation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Computers+in+medicine%22&quot;&gt;Computers in medicine&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research%22&quot;&gt;Research&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+evaluation%22&quot;&gt;Research evaluation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Time%22&quot;&gt;Time&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Task+performance%22&quot;&gt;Task performance&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Evaluation+research%22&quot;&gt;Evaluation research&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Research+bias%22&quot;&gt;Research bias&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Retrospective+studies%22&quot;&gt;Retrospective studies&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Solitary+pulmonary+nodule%22&quot;&gt;Solitary pulmonary nodule&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Equipment+%26+supplies%22&quot;&gt;Equipment &amp; supplies&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The purpose of this study was to compare sensitivity for detection of pulmonary nodules in MDCT scans and reading time of radiologists when using CAD as the second reader (SR) respectively concurrent reader (CR). Four radiologists analyzed 50 chest MDCT scans chosen from clinical routine two times and marked all detected pulmonary nodules: first with CAD as CR (display of CAD results immediately in the reading session) and later (median 14 weeks) with CAD as SR (display of CAD markers after completion of first reading without CAD). A Siemens LungCAD prototype was used. Sensitivities for detection of nodules and reading times were recorded. Sensitivity of reading with CAD as SR was significantly higher than reading without CAD (p &lt; 0.001) and CAD as CR (p &lt; 0.001). For nodule size of 1.75 mm or above no significant sensitivity difference between CAD as CR and reading without CAD was observed; e.g., for nodules above 4 mm sensitivity was 68% without CAD, 68% with CAD as CR (p = 0.45) and 75% with CAD as SR (p &lt; 0.001). Reading time was significantly shorter for CR (274 s) compared to reading without CAD (294 s; p = 0.04) and SR (337 s; p &lt; 0.001). In our study CAD could either speed up reading of chest CT cases for pulmonary nodules without relevant loss of sensitivity when used as CR, or it increased sensitivity at the cost of longer reading times when used as SR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of European Radiology is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=27004249
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s00330-007-0667-1
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 2941
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Lung diseases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Tomography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Radiologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical radiography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quantitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Artificial intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computed tomography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diagnostic errors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Diagnostic imaging
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Lung tumors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical cooperation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computers in medicine
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Time
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Task performance
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Retrospective studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Solitary pulmonary nodule
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Equipment & supplies
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Comparison of sensitivity and reading time for the use of computer-aided detection (CAD) of pulmonary nodules at MDCT as concurrent or second reader.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Beyer, F.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zierott, L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fallenberg, E.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Juergens, K.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stoeckel, J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heindel, W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wormanns, D.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fallenberg, E M
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Juergens, K U
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2007
              Type: published
              Y: 2007
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 09387994
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 17
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Radiology
              Type: main
ResultId 1