New exploratory work of evaluating a researcher’s output.
Saved in:
| Title: | New exploratory work of evaluating a researcher’s output. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Junping Qiu1, Ruimin Ma1, Ni Cheng1 |
| Source: | Scientometrics. Nov2008, Vol. 77 Issue 2, p335-344. 10p. |
| Subjects: | Research evaluation, Indexes, Citation indexes, Production (Economic theory), Bibliographical citations, Equations |
| Abstract: | SCI has been popular all over the world since it was published by Garfield in 1963. Researches on evaluating a researcher’s output with SCI have always been continuous. In recent years, a great breakthrough has been made since the h-index was put forward in 2005. In this paper, we also advance a new method — Paper Quality Index (PQI) to evaluate the output of a researcher. The main purpose of our method is to solve two problems that consist in the method of h-index: one is that the h-index can’t compare the outputs of researchers in different fields; the other is that it is unsuitable for evaluating the outputs of young researchers. A simple mathematical expression is constructed to eliminate the difference of citation among different fields and makes the evaluation of short-term outputs of researchers possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Scientometrics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 34963062 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: New exploratory work of evaluating a researcher’s output. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Junping+Qiu%22">Junping Qiu</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ruimin+Ma%22">Ruimin Ma</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ni+Cheng%22">Ni Cheng</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Scientometrics%22">Scientometrics</searchLink>. Nov2008, Vol. 77 Issue 2, p335-344. 10p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+evaluation%22">Research evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indexes%22">Indexes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Citation+indexes%22">Citation indexes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Production+%28Economic+theory%29%22">Production (Economic theory)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bibliographical+citations%22">Bibliographical citations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equations%22">Equations</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: SCI has been popular all over the world since it was published by Garfield in 1963. Researches on evaluating a researcher’s output with SCI have always been continuous. In recent years, a great breakthrough has been made since the h-index was put forward in 2005. In this paper, we also advance a new method — Paper Quality Index (PQI) to evaluate the output of a researcher. The main purpose of our method is to solve two problems that consist in the method of h-index: one is that the h-index can’t compare the outputs of researchers in different fields; the other is that it is unsuitable for evaluating the outputs of young researchers. A simple mathematical expression is constructed to eliminate the difference of citation among different fields and makes the evaluation of short-term outputs of researchers possible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Scientometrics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=34963062 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s11192-008-1782-8 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 335 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Research evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Indexes Type: general – SubjectFull: Citation indexes Type: general – SubjectFull: Production (Economic theory) Type: general – SubjectFull: Bibliographical citations Type: general – SubjectFull: Equations Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: New exploratory work of evaluating a researcher’s output. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Junping Qiu – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ruimin Ma – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ni Cheng IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 11 Text: Nov2008 Type: published Y: 2008 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01389130 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 77 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Scientometrics Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
