Law shaping technology: Technology shaping the law.
Saved in:
| Title: | Law shaping technology: Technology shaping the law. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Flint, David (AUTHOR) df@macroberts.com |
| Source: | International Review of Law, Computers & Technology. Mar-Jul2009, Vol. 23 Issue 1/2, p5-11. 7p. |
| Subjects: | Data protection, Computer security laws, Copyright, Computer crimes, Meta Platforms Inc., Security systems, Data security, Government policy |
| Abstract: | Although the original Data Protection Act in the UK was 1984, it was really only with the 1998 Act that data protection ever raised a murmur in the public consciousness. Privacy is about our 'right to be let alone'. (Louis Brandeis) Protecting privacy is about protecting our sense of self. The question has been raised: 'What are sites such as Facebook doing to protect our data and our privacy?' Consider a politician who takes all steps including injunction to prevent newspapers printing pictures of his children in order to protect their privacy, yet sends out thousands of Christmas cards showing those children - is that privacy, or hypocrisy? Maybe social networking sites have no obligation to protect our data - at least insofar as we have chosen to make it publicly available on those sites. Should law and society protect such blogs as free speech or protect those mentioned therein from having their information and exploits retained in perpetuity? I have focussed here on some of the data protection and privacy issues which appear to me to merit consideration. If the purpose of legal protection is to encourage creators, how does a music industry company such as Sony or Universal owning all the copyrights facilitate this purpose? How should the monopoly rights of content owners be reconciled with the rights of users? Is DRM compatible with permitted use under copyright law? If breach of data protection law should be punishable by financial penalty, how should breach in the public sector be handled, given that any penalty would simply be recycled? Should ISPs be required to police IP rights - and if so how does this fit with privacy concerns? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of International Review of Law, Computers & Technology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 37362619 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Law shaping technology: Technology shaping the law. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Flint%2C+David%22">Flint, David</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<i> df@macroberts.com</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22International+Review+of+Law%2C+Computers+%26+Technology%22">International Review of Law, Computers & Technology</searchLink>. Mar-Jul2009, Vol. 23 Issue 1/2, p5-11. 7p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+protection%22">Data protection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+security+laws%22">Computer security laws</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Copyright%22">Copyright</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+crimes%22">Computer crimes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta+Platforms+Inc%2E%22">Meta Platforms Inc.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Security+systems%22">Security systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+security%22">Data security</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+policy%22">Government policy</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Although the original Data Protection Act in the UK was 1984, it was really only with the 1998 Act that data protection ever raised a murmur in the public consciousness. Privacy is about our 'right to be let alone'. (Louis Brandeis) Protecting privacy is about protecting our sense of self. The question has been raised: 'What are sites such as Facebook doing to protect our data and our privacy?' Consider a politician who takes all steps including injunction to prevent newspapers printing pictures of his children in order to protect their privacy, yet sends out thousands of Christmas cards showing those children - is that privacy, or hypocrisy? Maybe social networking sites have no obligation to protect our data - at least insofar as we have chosen to make it publicly available on those sites. Should law and society protect such blogs as free speech or protect those mentioned therein from having their information and exploits retained in perpetuity? I have focussed here on some of the data protection and privacy issues which appear to me to merit consideration. If the purpose of legal protection is to encourage creators, how does a music industry company such as Sony or Universal owning all the copyrights facilitate this purpose? How should the monopoly rights of content owners be reconciled with the rights of users? Is DRM compatible with permitted use under copyright law? If breach of data protection law should be punishable by financial penalty, how should breach in the public sector be handled, given that any penalty would simply be recycled? Should ISPs be required to police IP rights - and if so how does this fit with privacy concerns? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of International Review of Law, Computers & Technology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=37362619 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/13600860902742505 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 5 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Data protection Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer security laws Type: general – SubjectFull: Copyright Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer crimes Type: general – SubjectFull: Meta Platforms Inc. Type: general – SubjectFull: Security systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Data security Type: general – SubjectFull: Government policy Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Law shaping technology: Technology shaping the law. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Flint, David IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Text: Mar-Jul2009 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 13600869 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 23 – Type: issue Value: 1/2 Titles: – TitleFull: International Review of Law, Computers & Technology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
