View in EDS PDF Full Text

SusTEInability of linguistic resources through feature structures.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: SusTEInability of linguistic resources through feature structures.
Authors: Witt, Andreas1 witt@ids-mannheim.de, Rehm, Georg2, Hinrichs, Erhard3, Lehmberg, Timm4, Stegmann, Jens5
Source: Literary & Linguistic Computing. Sep2009, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p363-372. 10p. 2 Diagrams.
Subjects: Text Encoding Initiative (Document type definition), Text processing (Computer science), Document markup languages, Document type definitions, Electronic data processing, Programming languages
Abstract: This article shows that the TEI tag set for feature structures can be adopted to represent a heterogeneous set of linguistic corpora. The majority of corpora is annotated using markup languages that are based on the Annotation Graph framework, the upcoming Linguistic Annotation Format ISO standard, or according to tag sets defined by or based upon the TEI guidelines. A unified representation comprises the separation of conceptually different annotation layers contained in the original corpus data (e.g. syntax, phonology, and semantics) into multiple XML files. These annotation layers are linked to each other implicitly by the identical textual content of all files. A suitable data structure for the representation of these annotations is a multi-rooted tree that again can be represented by the TEI and ISO tag set for feature structures. The mapping process and representational issues are discussed as well as the advantages and drawbacks associated with the use of the TEI tag set for feature structures as a storage and exchange format for linguistically annotated data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Literary & Linguistic Computing is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 45280367
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: SusTEInability of linguistic resources through feature structures.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Witt%2C+Andreas%22">Witt, Andreas</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> witt@ids-mannheim.de</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rehm%2C+Georg%22">Rehm, Georg</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hinrichs%2C+Erhard%22">Hinrichs, Erhard</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lehmberg%2C+Timm%22">Lehmberg, Timm</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stegmann%2C+Jens%22">Stegmann, Jens</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Literary+%26+Linguistic+Computing%22">Literary & Linguistic Computing</searchLink>. Sep2009, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p363-372. 10p. 2 Diagrams.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Text+Encoding+Initiative+%28Document+type+definition%29%22">Text Encoding Initiative (Document type definition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Text+processing+%28Computer+science%29%22">Text processing (Computer science)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Document+markup+languages%22">Document markup languages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Document+type+definitions%22">Document type definitions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+data+processing%22">Electronic data processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Programming+languages%22">Programming languages</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This article shows that the TEI tag set for feature structures can be adopted to represent a heterogeneous set of linguistic corpora. The majority of corpora is annotated using markup languages that are based on the Annotation Graph framework, the upcoming Linguistic Annotation Format ISO standard, or according to tag sets defined by or based upon the TEI guidelines. A unified representation comprises the separation of conceptually different annotation layers contained in the original corpus data (e.g. syntax, phonology, and semantics) into multiple XML files. These annotation layers are linked to each other implicitly by the identical textual content of all files. A suitable data structure for the representation of these annotations is a multi-rooted tree that again can be represented by the TEI and ISO tag set for feature structures. The mapping process and representational issues are discussed as well as the advantages and drawbacks associated with the use of the TEI tag set for feature structures as a storage and exchange format for linguistically annotated data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Literary & Linguistic Computing is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=45280367
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1093/llc/fqp024
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 10
        StartPage: 363
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Text Encoding Initiative (Document type definition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Text processing (Computer science)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Document markup languages
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Document type definitions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electronic data processing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Programming languages
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: SusTEInability of linguistic resources through feature structures.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Witt, Andreas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rehm, Georg
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hinrichs, Erhard
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lehmberg, Timm
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Stegmann, Jens
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2009
              Type: published
              Y: 2009
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 02681145
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 24
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Literary & Linguistic Computing
              Type: main
ResultId 1