Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority: How predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority: How predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models.
Authors: Hughes, Benjamin1 benjamin.hughes@alumni.esade.edu, Wareham, Jonathan1 wareham@acm.org, Joshi, Indra2 indrajoshi@hotmail.com
Source: Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. Mar2010, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p433-452. 20p. 3 Diagrams, 4 Charts.
Subjects: Internet, Electronic information resources, Database searching, Information retrieval, Internet searching, Thematic analysis, Online information services, Electronic information resource searching, Web search engines
Abstract: Literature examining information judgments and Internet search behaviors notes a number of major research gaps, including how users actually make these judgments outside of experiments or researcher-defined tasks, and how search behavior is impacted by a user's judgment of online information. Using the medical setting, where doctors face real consequences in applying the information found, we examine how information judgments employed by doctors to mitigate risk impact their cognitive search. Diaries encompassing 444 real clinical information search incidents, combined with semistructured interviews across 35 doctors, were analyzed via thematic analysis. Results show that doctors, though aware of the need for information quality and cognitive authority, rarely make evaluative judgments. This is explained by navigational bias in information searches and via predictive judgments that favor known sites where doctors perceive levels of information quality and cognitive authority. Doctors' mental models of the Internet sites and Web experience relevant to the task type enable these predictive judgments. These results suggest a model connecting online cognitive search and information judgment literatures. Moreover, this implies a need to understand cognitive search through longitudinal- or learning-based views for repeated search tasks, and adaptations to medical practitioner training and tools for online search. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 48069482
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority: How predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hughes%2C+Benjamin%22">Hughes, Benjamin</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> benjamin.hughes@alumni.esade.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wareham%2C+Jonathan%22">Wareham, Jonathan</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> wareham@acm.org</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Joshi%2C+Indra%22">Joshi, Indra</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> indrajoshi@hotmail.com</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+the+American+Society+for+Information+Science+%26+Technology%22">Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology</searchLink>. Mar2010, Vol. 61 Issue 3, p433-452. 20p. 3 Diagrams, 4 Charts.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Internet%22">Internet</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+information+resources%22">Electronic information resources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Database+searching%22">Database searching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+retrieval%22">Information retrieval</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Internet+searching%22">Internet searching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thematic+analysis%22">Thematic analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+information+services%22">Online information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+information+resource+searching%22">Electronic information resource searching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Web+search+engines%22">Web search engines</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Literature examining information judgments and Internet search behaviors notes a number of major research gaps, including how users actually make these judgments outside of experiments or researcher-defined tasks, and how search behavior is impacted by a user's judgment of online information. Using the medical setting, where doctors face real consequences in applying the information found, we examine how information judgments employed by doctors to mitigate risk impact their cognitive search. Diaries encompassing 444 real clinical information search incidents, combined with semistructured interviews across 35 doctors, were analyzed via thematic analysis. Results show that doctors, though aware of the need for information quality and cognitive authority, rarely make evaluative judgments. This is explained by navigational bias in information searches and via predictive judgments that favor known sites where doctors perceive levels of information quality and cognitive authority. Doctors' mental models of the Internet sites and Web experience relevant to the task type enable these predictive judgments. These results suggest a model connecting online cognitive search and information judgment literatures. Moreover, this implies a need to understand cognitive search through longitudinal- or learning-based views for repeated search tasks, and adaptations to medical practitioner training and tools for online search. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=48069482
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/asi.21245
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 433
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Internet
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electronic information resources
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Database searching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information retrieval
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Internet searching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Thematic analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Online information services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electronic information resource searching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Web search engines
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Doctors' online information needs, cognitive search strategies, and judgments of information quality and cognitive authority: How predictive judgments introduce bias into cognitive search models.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hughes, Benjamin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wareham, Jonathan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Joshi, Indra
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 03
              Text: Mar2010
              Type: published
              Y: 2010
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15322882
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 61
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology
              Type: main
ResultId 1