DEFENDING THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND MURPHY.
Saved in:
| Title: | DEFENDING THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND MURPHY. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kerr, Orin S.1 |
| Source: | Berkeley Technology Law Journal. Summer2009, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p1229-1237. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Third parties (Law), Epstein, Richard, Murphy, Erin, Common law, Crime |
| Abstract: | The article presents the author's opinion on the articles of Richard Epstein and Erin Murphy concerning the third party rule. The author cites the notion of Epstein on the third party doctrine including his focus on the first principles to explain the meaning of reasonable expectation and on the consequences of the application of the rule. He criticizes the assumption of Murphy on the role of substitution effects and negates his idea on the occurrence of crimes without third parties. |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 49068534 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: DEFENDING THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND MURPHY. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kerr%2C+Orin+S%2E%22">Kerr, Orin S.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Berkeley+Technology+Law+Journal%22">Berkeley Technology Law Journal</searchLink>. Summer2009, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p1229-1237. 9p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Third+parties+%28Law%29%22">Third parties (Law)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epstein%2C+Richard%22">Epstein, Richard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Murphy%2C+Erin%22">Murphy, Erin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Common+law%22">Common law</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Crime%22">Crime</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The article presents the author's opinion on the articles of Richard Epstein and Erin Murphy concerning the third party rule. The author cites the notion of Epstein on the third party doctrine including his focus on the first principles to explain the meaning of reasonable expectation and on the consequences of the application of the rule. He criticizes the assumption of Murphy on the role of substitution effects and negates his idea on the occurrence of crimes without third parties. |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=49068534 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 9 StartPage: 1229 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Third parties (Law) Type: general – SubjectFull: Epstein, Richard Type: general – SubjectFull: Murphy, Erin Type: general – SubjectFull: Common law Type: general – SubjectFull: Crime Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: DEFENDING THE THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND MURPHY. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kerr, Orin S. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Text: Summer2009 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10863818 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 24 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Berkeley Technology Law Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |