View in EDS PDF Full Text

THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE FOR THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND KERR.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE FOR THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND KERR.
Authors: Murphy, Erin1
Source: Berkeley Technology Law Journal. Summer2009, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p1239-1253. 15p.
Subjects: Third parties (Law), Epstein, Richard, Kerr, Orin, Police protection, Information sharing
Abstract: In this article the author discusses the stand of professors Richard Epstein and Orin S. Kerr on the third party doctrine. He notes the assertion of Epstein on the chief defect of the doctrine and on the revelation information disclosed to the third parties. He looks into the acknowledgment of Epstein on the coming of the third party problem and of the occurrence of the third party protection.
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 49068535
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE FOR THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND KERR.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Murphy%2C+Erin%22">Murphy, Erin</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Berkeley+Technology+Law+Journal%22">Berkeley Technology Law Journal</searchLink>. Summer2009, Vol. 24 Issue 3, p1239-1253. 15p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Third+parties+%28Law%29%22">Third parties (Law)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epstein%2C+Richard%22">Epstein, Richard</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Kerr%2C+Orin%22">Kerr, Orin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Police+protection%22">Police protection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+sharing%22">Information sharing</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In this article the author discusses the stand of professors Richard Epstein and Orin S. Kerr on the third party doctrine. He notes the assertion of Epstein on the chief defect of the doctrine and on the revelation information disclosed to the third parties. He looks into the acknowledgment of Epstein on the coming of the third party problem and of the occurrence of the third party protection.
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=49068535
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: 1239
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Third parties (Law)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Epstein, Richard
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Kerr, Orin
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Police protection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Information sharing
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: THE CASE AGAINST THE CASE FOR THIRD-PARTY DOCTRINE: A RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN AND KERR.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Murphy, Erin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Summer2009
              Type: published
              Y: 2009
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10863818
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 24
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Berkeley Technology Law Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1