Assessment of work postures and movements using a video-based observation method and direct technical measurements.
Saved in:
| Title: | Assessment of work postures and movements using a video-based observation method and direct technical measurements. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Juul-Kristensen, B., Hansson, G.-A., Fallentin, N., Andersen, J.H., Ekdahl, C. |
| Source: | Applied Ergonomics. Oct2001, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p517-524. 8p. 1 Black and White Photograph, 5 Charts. |
| Subjects: | Physiological aspects of work, Posture, Work, Evaluation research, Work environment, Research methodology, Research, Body movement, Comparative studies, Video recording, Regression analysis |
| Abstract: | The aim was to study postures and movements during repetitive work using video-based observations and direct technical measurements (inclinometers and goniometers). A total of 21 healthy women from a poultry processing plant volunteered. Neck flexion > 20 degrees was registered during 92% of the recorded time with the observation method, while the corresponding value measured with the inclinometer was 65%. Different reference positions and different measured variables apparently contributed to the differences between the methods. Mean wrist position was measured to be 0 degrees in flexion-extension and 19 degrees in ulnar deviation. Differences between the methods in the registered hand positions were small. The number of repetitive movements/minute and mean power frequency (MPF) of the electrogoniometer data was significantly related, showing both variables to be relevant measures of repetitiveness. In conclusion, the observation method and the technical measurements supplemented each other well. A reduction in class categories was suggested for future observation methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Applied Ergonomics is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 5138049 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Assessment of work postures and movements using a video-based observation method and direct technical measurements. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Juul-Kristensen%2C+B%2E%22">Juul-Kristensen, B.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hansson%2C+G%2E-A%2E%22">Hansson, G.-A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fallentin%2C+N%2E%22">Fallentin, N.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andersen%2C+J%2EH%2E%22">Andersen, J.H.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ekdahl%2C+C%2E%22">Ekdahl, C.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Applied+Ergonomics%22">Applied Ergonomics</searchLink>. Oct2001, Vol. 32 Issue 5, p517-524. 8p. 1 Black and White Photograph, 5 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physiological+aspects+of+work%22">Physiological aspects of work</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Posture%22">Posture</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work%22">Work</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+research%22">Evaluation research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Work+environment%22">Work environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research%22">Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Body+movement%22">Body movement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+studies%22">Comparative studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Video+recording%22">Video recording</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Regression+analysis%22">Regression analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The aim was to study postures and movements during repetitive work using video-based observations and direct technical measurements (inclinometers and goniometers). A total of 21 healthy women from a poultry processing plant volunteered. Neck flexion > 20 degrees was registered during 92% of the recorded time with the observation method, while the corresponding value measured with the inclinometer was 65%. Different reference positions and different measured variables apparently contributed to the differences between the methods. Mean wrist position was measured to be 0 degrees in flexion-extension and 19 degrees in ulnar deviation. Differences between the methods in the registered hand positions were small. The number of repetitive movements/minute and mean power frequency (MPF) of the electrogoniometer data was significantly related, showing both variables to be relevant measures of repetitiveness. In conclusion, the observation method and the technical measurements supplemented each other well. A reduction in class categories was suggested for future observation methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Applied Ergonomics is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=5138049 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00017-5 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 517 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Physiological aspects of work Type: general – SubjectFull: Posture Type: general – SubjectFull: Work Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation research Type: general – SubjectFull: Work environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Research methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Body movement Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Video recording Type: general – SubjectFull: Regression analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Assessment of work postures and movements using a video-based observation method and direct technical measurements. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Juul-Kristensen, B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hansson, G.-A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fallentin, N. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andersen, J.H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ekdahl, C. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: Oct2001 Type: published Y: 2001 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00036870 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 32 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Applied Ergonomics Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |