Educating reflective systems developers.
Saved in:
| Title: | Educating reflective systems developers. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Mathiassen, Lars1, Purao, Sandeep2 |
| Source: | Information Systems Journal. Apr2002, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p81-102. 22p. 2 Diagrams. |
| Subjects: | Computer technicians, Computer systems, Systems development, Education |
| Geographic Terms: | United States |
| Abstract: | Abstract. Systems development research shows that practitioners seldom follow methods and that the competencies required for successful development of computer-based systems go well beyond those represented in contemporary methods. These insights make us question the role that methods should play in educating would-be developers. Pedagogical theories, such as situated learning and double-loop learning, complement these insights. Integrating the two, we argue that students need to complement the simplified accounts that methods express, with reflections on methods-in-use and on development practice in general. We present operationalizations of this idea in two quite different academic settings. Based on a retrospective analysis of our experiences in these settings, and a comparison and evaluation of the two approaches, we propose a number of lessons that can be used to improve the education of would-be developers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Information Systems Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 6526400 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Educating reflective systems developers. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mathiassen%2C+Lars%22">Mathiassen, Lars</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Purao%2C+Sandeep%22">Purao, Sandeep</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Information+Systems+Journal%22">Information Systems Journal</searchLink>. Apr2002, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p81-102. 22p. 2 Diagrams. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+technicians%22">Computer technicians</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+systems%22">Computer systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+development%22">Systems development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education%22">Education</searchLink> – Name: SubjectGeographic Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Abstract. Systems development research shows that practitioners seldom follow methods and that the competencies required for successful development of computer-based systems go well beyond those represented in contemporary methods. These insights make us question the role that methods should play in educating would-be developers. Pedagogical theories, such as situated learning and double-loop learning, complement these insights. Integrating the two, we argue that students need to complement the simplified accounts that methods express, with reflections on methods-in-use and on development practice in general. We present operationalizations of this idea in two quite different academic settings. Based on a retrospective analysis of our experiences in these settings, and a comparison and evaluation of the two approaches, we propose a number of lessons that can be used to improve the education of would-be developers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Information Systems Journal is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=6526400 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00122.x Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 22 StartPage: 81 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Computer technicians Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Systems development Type: general – SubjectFull: Education Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Educating reflective systems developers. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mathiassen, Lars – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Purao, Sandeep IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Text: Apr2002 Type: published Y: 2002 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 13501917 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 12 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Information Systems Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
