Splittability of Bilexical Context-Free Grammars is Undecidable.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Splittability of Bilexical Context-Free Grammars is Undecidable.
Authors: Nederhof, Mark-Jan1 markjan.nederhof@gmail.com, Satta, Giorgio2 satta@dei.unipd.it
Source: Computational Linguistics. Sep2011, Vol. 37 Issue 3, Special section p1-23. 23p.
Subjects: Linguistic String Parser (Computer grammar), Lexical-functional grammar, Lexicon, Parsing (Grammar), Content analysis, Document style semantics & specification language, Corpora
Abstract: Bilexical context-free grammars (2-LCFGs) have proved to be accurate models for statistical natural language parsing. Existing dynamic programming algorithms used to parse sentences under these models have running time of O(|w|4), where w is the input string. A 2-LCFG is splittable if the left arguments of a lexical head are always independent of the right arguments, and vice versa. When a 2-LCFGs is splittable, parsing time can be asymptotically improved to O(|w|³). Testing this property is therefore of central interest to parsing efficiency. However, in this article we show the negative result that splittability of 2-LCFGs is undecidable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Computational Linguistics is the property of MIT Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 69934063
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Splittability of Bilexical Context-Free Grammars is Undecidable.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nederhof%2C+Mark-Jan%22">Nederhof, Mark-Jan</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> markjan.nederhof@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Satta%2C+Giorgio%22">Satta, Giorgio</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> satta@dei.unipd.it</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Computational+Linguistics%22">Computational Linguistics</searchLink>. Sep2011, Vol. 37 Issue 3, Special section p1-23. 23p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Linguistic+String+Parser+%28Computer+grammar%29%22">Linguistic String Parser (Computer grammar)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lexical-functional+grammar%22">Lexical-functional grammar</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lexicon%22">Lexicon</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parsing+%28Grammar%29%22">Parsing (Grammar)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+analysis%22">Content analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Document+style+semantics+%26+specification+language%22">Document style semantics & specification language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Corpora%22">Corpora</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Bilexical context-free grammars (2-LCFGs) have proved to be accurate models for statistical natural language parsing. Existing dynamic programming algorithms used to parse sentences under these models have running time of O(|w|4), where w is the input string. A 2-LCFG is splittable if the left arguments of a lexical head are always independent of the right arguments, and vice versa. When a 2-LCFGs is splittable, parsing time can be asymptotically improved to O(|w|³). Testing this property is therefore of central interest to parsing efficiency. However, in this article we show the negative result that splittability of 2-LCFGs is undecidable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Computational Linguistics is the property of MIT Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=69934063
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1162/COLI_a_00079
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Linguistic String Parser (Computer grammar)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Lexical-functional grammar
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Lexicon
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Parsing (Grammar)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Content analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Document style semantics & specification language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Corpora
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Splittability of Bilexical Context-Free Grammars is Undecidable.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nederhof, Mark-Jan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Satta, Giorgio
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2011
              Type: published
              Y: 2011
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 08912017
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 37
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Computational Linguistics
              Type: main
ResultId 1