Common-reflection-surface imaging of shallow and ultrashallow reflectors.
Saved in:
| Title: | Common-reflection-surface imaging of shallow and ultrashallow reflectors. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Deidda, Gian Piero1 gpdeidda@unica.it, Battaglia, Enzo1 ebattaglia@unica.it, Heilmann, Zeno2 zeno@crs4.it |
| Source: | Geophysics. Jul/Aug2012, Vol. 77 Issue 4, pB177-B185. 9p. |
| Subjects: | Seismic reflection method data processing, Lighting reflectors, Seismic prospecting, Geophysical prospecting, Seismometry |
| Abstract: | We analyzed the feasibility of the common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack for near-surface surveys as an alternative to the conventional common midpoint (CMP) stacking procedure. The data-driven, less user-interactive CRS method could be more cost efficient for shallow surveys, where the high sensitivity to velocity analysis makes data processing a critical step. We compared the results for two field data sets collected to image shallow and ultrashallow reflectors: an example of shallow P-wave reflection for targets in the first few hundred meters, and an example of SH-wave reflection for targets in the first 10 m. By processing the shallow P-wave records using the CMP method, we imaged several nearly horizontal reflectors with onsets from 60 to about 250 ms. The CRS stack produced a stacked section more suited for a subsurface interpretation, without any preliminary formal and time-consuming velocity analysis, because the imaged reflectors possessed greater coherency and lateral continuity. With CMP processing of the SH-wave records, we imaged a dipping bedrock interface below four horizontal reflectors in unconsolidated, very low velocity sediments. The vertical and lateral resolution was very high, despite the very shallow depth: the image showed the pinchout of two layers at less than 10 m depth. The numerous traces used by the CRS stack improved the continuity of the shallowest reflector, but the deepest overburden reflectors appear unresolved, with not well-imaged pinchouts. Using the kinematic wavefield attributes determined for each stacking operation, we retrieved velocity fields fitting the stacking velocities we had estimated in the CMP processing. The use of CRS stack could be a significant step ahead to increase the acceptance of the seismic reflection method as a routine investigation method in shallow and ultrashallow seismics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Geophysics is the property of Society of Exploration Geophysicists and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 79568750 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Common-reflection-surface imaging of shallow and ultrashallow reflectors. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deidda%2C+Gian+Piero%22">Deidda, Gian Piero</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> gpdeidda@unica.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Battaglia%2C+Enzo%22">Battaglia, Enzo</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> ebattaglia@unica.it</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heilmann%2C+Zeno%22">Heilmann, Zeno</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> zeno@crs4.it</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Geophysics%22">Geophysics</searchLink>. Jul/Aug2012, Vol. 77 Issue 4, pB177-B185. 9p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Seismic+reflection+method+data+processing%22">Seismic reflection method data processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lighting+reflectors%22">Lighting reflectors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Seismic+prospecting%22">Seismic prospecting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Geophysical+prospecting%22">Geophysical prospecting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Seismometry%22">Seismometry</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: We analyzed the feasibility of the common-reflection-surface (CRS) stack for near-surface surveys as an alternative to the conventional common midpoint (CMP) stacking procedure. The data-driven, less user-interactive CRS method could be more cost efficient for shallow surveys, where the high sensitivity to velocity analysis makes data processing a critical step. We compared the results for two field data sets collected to image shallow and ultrashallow reflectors: an example of shallow P-wave reflection for targets in the first few hundred meters, and an example of SH-wave reflection for targets in the first 10 m. By processing the shallow P-wave records using the CMP method, we imaged several nearly horizontal reflectors with onsets from 60 to about 250 ms. The CRS stack produced a stacked section more suited for a subsurface interpretation, without any preliminary formal and time-consuming velocity analysis, because the imaged reflectors possessed greater coherency and lateral continuity. With CMP processing of the SH-wave records, we imaged a dipping bedrock interface below four horizontal reflectors in unconsolidated, very low velocity sediments. The vertical and lateral resolution was very high, despite the very shallow depth: the image showed the pinchout of two layers at less than 10 m depth. The numerous traces used by the CRS stack improved the continuity of the shallowest reflector, but the deepest overburden reflectors appear unresolved, with not well-imaged pinchouts. Using the kinematic wavefield attributes determined for each stacking operation, we retrieved velocity fields fitting the stacking velocities we had estimated in the CMP processing. The use of CRS stack could be a significant step ahead to increase the acceptance of the seismic reflection method as a routine investigation method in shallow and ultrashallow seismics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Geophysics is the property of Society of Exploration Geophysicists and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=79568750 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1190/GEO2011-0401.1 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 9 StartPage: B177 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Seismic reflection method data processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Lighting reflectors Type: general – SubjectFull: Seismic prospecting Type: general – SubjectFull: Geophysical prospecting Type: general – SubjectFull: Seismometry Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Common-reflection-surface imaging of shallow and ultrashallow reflectors. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Deidda, Gian Piero – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Battaglia, Enzo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Heilmann, Zeno IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul/Aug2012 Type: published Y: 2012 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00168033 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 77 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Geophysics Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |