Automatic quantification of epicardial fat volume on non-enhanced cardiac CT scans using a multi-atlas segmentation approach.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Automatic quantification of epicardial fat volume on non-enhanced cardiac CT scans using a multi-atlas segmentation approach.
Authors: Shahzad, Rahil1, Bos, Daniel2, Metz, Coert3, Rossi, Alexia4, Kirişli, Hortense3, van der Lugt, Aad4, Klein, Stefan3, Witteman, Jacqueline5, de Feyter, Pim4, Niessen, Wiro1, van Vliet, Lucas6, van Walsum, Theo3
Source: Medical Physics. Sep2013, Vol. 40 Issue 9, p091910-N.PAG. 9p.
Subjects: Automation, Predicate calculus, Computed tomography, Cardiovascular diseases, Heart physiology, Coefficients (Statistics)
Abstract: Purpose: There is increasing evidence that epicardial fat (i.e., adipose tissue contained within the pericardium) plays an important role in the development of cardiovascular disease. Obtaining the epicardial fat volume from routinely performed non-enhanced cardiac CT scans is therefore of clinical interest. The purpose of this work is to investigate the feasibility of automatic pericardium segmentation and subsequent quantification of epicardial fat on non-enhanced cardiac CT scans. Methods: Imaging data of 98 randomly selected subjects belonging to a larger cohort of subjects who underwent a cardiac CT scan at our medical center were retrieved. The data were acquired on two different scanners. Automatic multi-atlas based method for segmenting the pericardium and calculating the epicardial fat volume has been developed. The performance of the method was assessed by (1) comparing the automatically segmented pericardium to a manually annotated reference standard, (2) comparing the automatically obtained epicardial fat volumes to those obtained manually, and (3) comparing the accuracy of the automatic results to the inter-observer variability. Results: Automatic segmentation of the pericardium was achieved with a Dice similarity index of 89.1 ± 2.6% with respect to Observer 1 and 89.2 ± 1.9% with respect to Observer 2. The correlation between the automatic method and the manual observers with respect to the epicardial fat volume computed as the Pearson's correlation coefficient (R) was 0.91 (P < 0.001) for both observers. The inter-observer study resulted in a Dice similarity index of 89.0 ± 2.4% for segmenting the pericardium and a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.92 (P < 0.001) for computation of the epicardial fat volume. Conclusions: The authors developed a fully automatic method that is capable of segmenting the pericardium and quantifying epicardial fat on non-enhanced cardiac CT scans. The authors demonstrated the feasibility of using this method to replace manual annotations by showing that the automatic method performs as good as manual annotation on a large dataset. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 90063913
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Automatic quantification of epicardial fat volume on non-enhanced cardiac CT scans using a multi-atlas segmentation approach.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Shahzad%2C+Rahil%22&quot;&gt;Shahzad, Rahil&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Bos%2C+Daniel%22&quot;&gt;Bos, Daniel&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;2&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Metz%2C+Coert%22&quot;&gt;Metz, Coert&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Rossi%2C+Alexia%22&quot;&gt;Rossi, Alexia&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Kirişli%2C+Hortense%22&quot;&gt;Kirişli, Hortense&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22van+der+Lugt%2C+Aad%22&quot;&gt;van der Lugt, Aad&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Klein%2C+Stefan%22&quot;&gt;Klein, Stefan&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Witteman%2C+Jacqueline%22&quot;&gt;Witteman, Jacqueline&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;5&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22de+Feyter%2C+Pim%22&quot;&gt;de Feyter, Pim&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;4&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22Niessen%2C+Wiro%22&quot;&gt;Niessen, Wiro&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;1&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22van+Vliet%2C+Lucas%22&quot;&gt;van Vliet, Lucas&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;6&lt;/relatesTo&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;AR&quot; term=&quot;%22van+Walsum%2C+Theo%22&quot;&gt;van Walsum, Theo&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;relatesTo&gt;3&lt;/relatesTo&gt;
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;JN&quot; term=&quot;%22Medical+Physics%22&quot;&gt;Medical Physics&lt;/searchLink&gt;. Sep2013, Vol. 40 Issue 9, p091910-N.PAG. 9p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: &lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Automation%22&quot;&gt;Automation&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Predicate+calculus%22&quot;&gt;Predicate calculus&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Computed+tomography%22&quot;&gt;Computed tomography&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Cardiovascular+diseases%22&quot;&gt;Cardiovascular diseases&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Heart+physiology%22&quot;&gt;Heart physiology&lt;/searchLink&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;searchLink fieldCode=&quot;DE&quot; term=&quot;%22Coefficients+%28Statistics%29%22&quot;&gt;Coefficients (Statistics)&lt;/searchLink&gt;
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: There is increasing evidence that epicardial fat (i.e., adipose tissue contained within the pericardium) plays an important role in the development of cardiovascular disease. Obtaining the epicardial fat volume from routinely performed non-enhanced cardiac CT scans is therefore of clinical interest. The purpose of this work is to investigate the feasibility of automatic pericardium segmentation and subsequent quantification of epicardial fat on non-enhanced cardiac CT scans. Methods: Imaging data of 98 randomly selected subjects belonging to a larger cohort of subjects who underwent a cardiac CT scan at our medical center were retrieved. The data were acquired on two different scanners. Automatic multi-atlas based method for segmenting the pericardium and calculating the epicardial fat volume has been developed. The performance of the method was assessed by (1) comparing the automatically segmented pericardium to a manually annotated reference standard, (2) comparing the automatically obtained epicardial fat volumes to those obtained manually, and (3) comparing the accuracy of the automatic results to the inter-observer variability. Results: Automatic segmentation of the pericardium was achieved with a Dice similarity index of 89.1 &#177; 2.6% with respect to Observer 1 and 89.2 &#177; 1.9% with respect to Observer 2. The correlation between the automatic method and the manual observers with respect to the epicardial fat volume computed as the Pearson&#39;s correlation coefficient (R) was 0.91 (P &lt; 0.001) for both observers. The inter-observer study resulted in a Dice similarity index of 89.0 &#177; 2.4% for segmenting the pericardium and a Pearson&#39;s correlation coefficient of 0.92 (P &lt; 0.001) for computation of the epicardial fat volume. Conclusions: The authors developed a fully automatic method that is capable of segmenting the pericardium and quantifying epicardial fat on non-enhanced cardiac CT scans. The authors demonstrated the feasibility of using this method to replace manual annotations by showing that the automatic method performs as good as manual annotation on a large dataset. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: &lt;i&gt;Copyright of Medical Physics is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder&#39;s express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.&lt;/i&gt; (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=90063913
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1118/1.4817577
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 091910
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Automation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Predicate calculus
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computed tomography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cardiovascular diseases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Heart physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Coefficients (Statistics)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Automatic quantification of epicardial fat volume on non-enhanced cardiac CT scans using a multi-atlas segmentation approach.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shahzad, Rahil
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bos, Daniel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Metz, Coert
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rossi, Alexia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kirişli, Hortense
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van der Lugt, Aad
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Klein, Stefan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Witteman, Jacqueline
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: de Feyter, Pim
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Niessen, Wiro
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Vliet, Lucas
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: van Walsum, Theo
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2013
              Type: published
              Y: 2013
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00942405
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 40
            – Type: issue
              Value: 9
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Medical Physics
              Type: main
ResultId 1