High spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using compressed sensing with magnitude image subtraction.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: High spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography using compressed sensing with magnitude image subtraction.
Authors: Rapacchi, Stanislas1, Han, Fei1,2, Natsuaki, Yutaka3, Kroeker, Randall3, Plotnik, Adam1, Lehrman, Evan1, Sayre, James1,4, Laub, Gerhard3, Finn, J Paul1,5, Hu, Peng1,2,5
Source: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. May2014, Vol. 71 Issue 5, p1771-1783. 13p.
Abstract: Purpose We propose a compressed-sensing (CS) technique based on magnitude image subtraction for high spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). Methods Our technique integrates the magnitude difference image into the CS reconstruction to promote subtraction sparsity. Fully sampled Cartesian 3D CE-MRA datasets from 6 volunteers were retrospectively under-sampled and three reconstruction strategies were evaluated: k-space subtraction CS, independent CS, and magnitude subtraction CS. The techniques were compared in image quality (vessel delineation, image artifacts, and noise) and image reconstruction error. Our CS technique was further tested on seven volunteers using a prospectively under-sampled CE-MRA sequence. Results Compared with k-space subtraction and independent CS, our magnitude subtraction CS provides significantly better vessel delineation and less noise at 4× acceleration, and significantly less reconstruction error at 4× and 8× ( P < 0.05 for all). On a 1-4 point image quality scale in vessel delineation, our technique scored 3.8 ± 0.4 at 4×, 2.8 ± 0.4 at 8×, and 2.3 ± 0.6 at 12× acceleration. Using our CS sequence at 12× acceleration, we were able to acquire dynamic CE-MRA with higher spatial and temporal resolution than current clinical TWIST protocol while maintaining comparable image quality (2.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4, P = NS). Conclusion Our technique is promising for dynamic CE-MRA. Magn Reson Med 71:1771-1783, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
Description
Abstract:Purpose We propose a compressed-sensing (CS) technique based on magnitude image subtraction for high spatial and temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA). Methods Our technique integrates the magnitude difference image into the CS reconstruction to promote subtraction sparsity. Fully sampled Cartesian 3D CE-MRA datasets from 6 volunteers were retrospectively under-sampled and three reconstruction strategies were evaluated: k-space subtraction CS, independent CS, and magnitude subtraction CS. The techniques were compared in image quality (vessel delineation, image artifacts, and noise) and image reconstruction error. Our CS technique was further tested on seven volunteers using a prospectively under-sampled CE-MRA sequence. Results Compared with k-space subtraction and independent CS, our magnitude subtraction CS provides significantly better vessel delineation and less noise at 4× acceleration, and significantly less reconstruction error at 4× and 8× ( P < 0.05 for all). On a 1-4 point image quality scale in vessel delineation, our technique scored 3.8 ± 0.4 at 4×, 2.8 ± 0.4 at 8×, and 2.3 ± 0.6 at 12× acceleration. Using our CS sequence at 12× acceleration, we were able to acquire dynamic CE-MRA with higher spatial and temporal resolution than current clinical TWIST protocol while maintaining comparable image quality (2.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.0 ± 0.4, P = NS). Conclusion Our technique is promising for dynamic CE-MRA. Magn Reson Med 71:1771-1783, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:07403194
DOI:10.1002/mrm.24842