Reassessing the Effect of Survey Characteristics on Common Method Bias in Emotional and Social Intelligence Competencies Assessment.
Saved in:
| Title: | Reassessing the Effect of Survey Characteristics on Common Method Bias in Emotional and Social Intelligence Competencies Assessment. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Batista-Foguet, Joan Manuel1, Revilla, Melanie2, Saris, Willem E.2, Boyatzis, Richard3, Serlavós, Ricard1 |
| Source: | Structural Equation Modeling. Oct2014, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p596-607. 12p. |
| Subjects: | Common method variance, Emotional intelligence, Social intelligence, Multitrait multimethod techniques, Data quality, Measurement errors |
| Abstract: | Since the idea of method variance was inspired by D. T. Campbell and Fiske in 1959, many papers have demonstrated an ongoing debate about both its nature and impact. Often, method variance entails an upward bias in correlations among observed variables—common method bias. This article reports a split-ballot multitrait–multimethod experimental design for estimating 2 opposite biases: the upward biasing method variance from the reaction to the length of the response scale and the position of the survey items in the questionnaire and the downward biasing effect of poor data quality. The data are derived from self-reported behavior related to emotional and social competencies. This article illustrates a methodology to estimate common method bias and its components: common method scale variance, common method occasion variance, and the attenuation effect due to measurement errors. The results show that common method variance has a much smaller impact than random and systematic measurement errors. The results also corroborate previous findings: the greater reliability of longer scales and the lower reliability of items placed toward the end of the survey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Structural Equation Modeling is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Engineering Source |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: egs DbLabel: Engineering Source An: 98645438 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Reassessing the Effect of Survey Characteristics on Common Method Bias in Emotional and Social Intelligence Competencies Assessment. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Batista-Foguet%2C+Joan+Manuel%22">Batista-Foguet, Joan Manuel</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Revilla%2C+Melanie%22">Revilla, Melanie</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Saris%2C+Willem+E%2E%22">Saris, Willem E.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boyatzis%2C+Richard%22">Boyatzis, Richard</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Serlavós%2C+Ricard%22">Serlavós, Ricard</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Structural+Equation+Modeling%22">Structural Equation Modeling</searchLink>. Oct2014, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p596-607. 12p. – Name: Subject Label: Subjects Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Common+method+variance%22">Common method variance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emotional+intelligence%22">Emotional intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+intelligence%22">Social intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multitrait+multimethod+techniques%22">Multitrait multimethod techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+quality%22">Data quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement+errors%22">Measurement errors</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Since the idea of method variance was inspired by D. T. Campbell and Fiske in 1959, many papers have demonstrated an ongoing debate about both its nature and impact. Often, method variance entails an upward bias in correlations among observed variables—common method bias. This article reports a split-ballot multitrait–multimethod experimental design for estimating 2 opposite biases: the upward biasing method variance from the reaction to the length of the response scale and the position of the survey items in the questionnaire and the downward biasing effect of poor data quality. The data are derived from self-reported behavior related to emotional and social competencies. This article illustrates a methodology to estimate common method bias and its components: common method scale variance, common method occasion variance, and the attenuation effect due to measurement errors. The results show that common method variance has a much smaller impact than random and systematic measurement errors. The results also corroborate previous findings: the greater reliability of longer scales and the lower reliability of items placed toward the end of the survey. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Structural Equation Modeling is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=98645438 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/10705511.2014.934767 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 596 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Common method variance Type: general – SubjectFull: Emotional intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Social intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Multitrait multimethod techniques Type: general – SubjectFull: Data quality Type: general – SubjectFull: Measurement errors Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Reassessing the Effect of Survey Characteristics on Common Method Bias in Emotional and Social Intelligence Competencies Assessment. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Batista-Foguet, Joan Manuel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Revilla, Melanie – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Saris, Willem E. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Boyatzis, Richard – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Serlavós, Ricard IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: Oct2014 Type: published Y: 2014 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10705511 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 21 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Structural Equation Modeling Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
