Top management team diversity in fostering organizational ambidexterity: Examining TMT integration mechanisms.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Top management team diversity in fostering organizational ambidexterity: Examining TMT integration mechanisms.
Authors: Li, Ci-Rong1
Source: Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice. Dec2014, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p303-322. 20p.
Subjects: Senior leadership teams, Organizational research, Strategic planning, Knowledge management, Business models
Abstract: Combining the upper echelons theory and intra-group conflict view, this paper argues that diverse teams have a dual nature that simultaneously facilitates and hinders organizational ambidexterity. This study suggests that establishing a governance mechanism to manage the dual impact of team diversity is crucial. This study is based on a questionnaire survey and analysis using a sample of 196 firms in China. The findings show that team diversity not only positively influences organizational ambidexterity through strategic planning processes but impedes ambidexterity through intra-group conflicts. The results also show that senior team integration mechanisms increase the ability of top executives to manage the ambiguous effect of diversity to facilitate organizational ambidexterity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Engineering Source
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: egs
DbLabel: Engineering Source
An: 99801273
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Top management team diversity in fostering organizational ambidexterity: Examining TMT integration mechanisms.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Ci-Rong%22">Li, Ci-Rong</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Innovation%3A+Management%2C+Policy+%26+Practice%22">Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice</searchLink>. Dec2014, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p303-322. 20p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subjects
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Senior+leadership+teams%22">Senior leadership teams</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Organizational+research%22">Organizational research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Strategic+planning%22">Strategic planning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+management%22">Knowledge management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Business+models%22">Business models</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Combining the upper echelons theory and intra-group conflict view, this paper argues that diverse teams have a dual nature that simultaneously facilitates and hinders organizational ambidexterity. This study suggests that establishing a governance mechanism to manage the dual impact of team diversity is crucial. This study is based on a questionnaire survey and analysis using a sample of 196 firms in China. The findings show that team diversity not only positively influences organizational ambidexterity through strategic planning processes but impedes ambidexterity through intra-group conflicts. The results also show that senior team integration mechanisms increase the ability of top executives to manage the ambiguous effect of diversity to facilitate organizational ambidexterity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=egs&AN=99801273
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/14479338.2014.11081990
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 303
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Senior leadership teams
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Organizational research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Strategic planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Knowledge management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Business models
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Top management team diversity in fostering organizational ambidexterity: Examining TMT integration mechanisms.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li, Ci-Rong
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2014
              Type: published
              Y: 2014
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 14479338
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 16
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1