Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012.
Saved in:
| Title: | Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012. |
|---|---|
| Alternate Title: | Comparativa entre instrumentos de evaluación de calidad de cursos MOOC: ADECUR vs Normas UNE 66181:2012. |
| Authors: | Ramírez Fernández, Miguel Baldomero1 mbramfer@upo.es, Salmerón Silvera, José Luis1 salmeror@acm.org, Meneses, Eloy López1 elopmen@upo.es |
| Source: | RUSC: Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento. Jan2015, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p131-144. 14p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Massive open online courses, *Higher education, *Educational quality, *College curriculum, Scientific literature |
| Abstract (English): | Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have emerged in informative and scientific literature as a revolution with great potential within the educational and training world. However, at the same time, there are discrepancies and questions about the pedagogical value and scope that this movement has on higher education. Therefore, the MOOC universe is the object of educational consideration among various authors and institutions in the globalised world, but some dimensions and implications of their evaluation still need to be assessed and analysed from different perspectives. In this paper, we introduce a comparative overview of the quality indicators of two instruments for assessing MOOCs: Standard UNE 66181:2012 on quality management for virtual teaching, and the training analysis instrument for teaching models and strategies of online university courses (ADECUR). Lastly, we will introduce the development of a tool for assessing the quality of MOOCs based on the strengths of the two instruments examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (Spanish): | Los cursos abiertos en línea y masivos (en adelante MOOC) se han considerado en la literatura divulgativa y científica como una revolución con un gran potencial en el mundo educativo y formativo. Sin embargo, al mismo tiempo, existen discrepancias y cuestionamientos sobre el valor pedagógico y el alcance que tendrá el movimiento en la educación superior. Así pues, el universo de los MOOC es objeto de reflexión didáctica y formativa entre diferentes autores e instituciones en el mundo globalizado, pero todavía son necesarias unas dimensiones y unas implicaciones de la visión evaluadora de los mismos que deben ser valoradas y analizadas desde diferentes puntos de vista. En este artículo se presenta un panorama comparativo de los indicadores de calidad de dos instrumentos de evaluación de los cursos MOOC: la Norma UNE 66181:2012 sobre la gestión de la calidad de la formación virtual y el instrumento de análisis didáctico de modelo y estrategias de enseñanza de cursos universitarios en red (ADECUR). Por último, se planteará un diseño de herramienta de evaluación de calidad de cursos MOOC en base a las fortalezas de los dos instrumentos analizados. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of RUSC: Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento is the property of Fundacio per a la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 100666358 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012. – Name: TitleAlt Label: Alternate Title Group: TiAlt Data: Comparativa entre instrumentos de evaluación de calidad de cursos MOOC: ADECUR vs Normas UNE 66181:2012. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ramírez+Fernández%2C+Miguel+Baldomero%22">Ramírez Fernández, Miguel Baldomero</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> mbramfer@upo.es</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Salmerón+Silvera%2C+José+Luis%22">Salmerón Silvera, José Luis</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> salmeror@acm.org</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meneses%2C+Eloy+López%22">Meneses, Eloy López</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> elopmen@upo.es</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22RUSC%3A+Revista+de+Universidad+y+Sociedad+del+Conocimiento%22">RUSC: Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento</searchLink>. Jan2015, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p131-144. 14p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Massive+open+online+courses%22">Massive open online courses</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+education%22">Higher education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+quality%22">Educational quality</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+curriculum%22">College curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+literature%22">Scientific literature</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (English) Group: Ab Data: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have emerged in informative and scientific literature as a revolution with great potential within the educational and training world. However, at the same time, there are discrepancies and questions about the pedagogical value and scope that this movement has on higher education. Therefore, the MOOC universe is the object of educational consideration among various authors and institutions in the globalised world, but some dimensions and implications of their evaluation still need to be assessed and analysed from different perspectives. In this paper, we introduce a comparative overview of the quality indicators of two instruments for assessing MOOCs: Standard UNE 66181:2012 on quality management for virtual teaching, and the training analysis instrument for teaching models and strategies of online university courses (ADECUR). Lastly, we will introduce the development of a tool for assessing the quality of MOOCs based on the strengths of the two instruments examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract (Spanish) Group: Ab Data: Los cursos abiertos en línea y masivos (en adelante MOOC) se han considerado en la literatura divulgativa y científica como una revolución con un gran potencial en el mundo educativo y formativo. Sin embargo, al mismo tiempo, existen discrepancias y cuestionamientos sobre el valor pedagógico y el alcance que tendrá el movimiento en la educación superior. Así pues, el universo de los MOOC es objeto de reflexión didáctica y formativa entre diferentes autores e instituciones en el mundo globalizado, pero todavía son necesarias unas dimensiones y unas implicaciones de la visión evaluadora de los mismos que deben ser valoradas y analizadas desde diferentes puntos de vista. En este artículo se presenta un panorama comparativo de los indicadores de calidad de dos instrumentos de evaluación de los cursos MOOC: la Norma UNE 66181:2012 sobre la gestión de la calidad de la formación virtual y el instrumento de análisis didáctico de modelo y estrategias de enseñanza de cursos universitarios en red (ADECUR). Por último, se planteará un diseño de herramienta de evaluación de calidad de cursos MOOC en base a las fortalezas de los dos instrumentos analizados. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of RUSC: Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento is the property of Fundacio per a la Universitat Oberta de Catalunya and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=100666358 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2258 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 131 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Massive open online courses Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational quality Type: general – SubjectFull: College curriculum Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific literature Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ramírez Fernández, Miguel Baldomero – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Salmerón Silvera, José Luis – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Meneses, Eloy López IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: Jan2015 Type: published Y: 2015 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1698580X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 12 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: RUSC: Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
