View in EDS PDF Full Text

Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands.
Authors: Rushforth, Alexander1 a.d.rushforth@cwts.leidenuniv.nl, Rijcke, Sarah1
Source: Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy. Jun2015, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p117-139. 23p.
Subject Terms: *Bibliometrics, *Bibliography, *Methodology, Key performance indicators (Management), Medical periodicals, Medical publishing, Periodicals
Abstract: The range and types of performance metrics has recently proliferated in academic settings, with bibliometric indicators being particularly visible examples. One field that has traditionally been hospitable towards such indicators is biomedicine. Here the relative merits of bibliometrics are widely discussed, with debates often portraying them as heroes or villains. Despite a plethora of controversies, one of the most widely used indicators in this field is said to be the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). In this article we argue that much of the current debates around researchers' uses of the JIF in biomedicine can be classed as 'folk theories': explanatory accounts told among a community that seldom (if ever) get systematically checked. Such accounts rarely disclose how knowledge production itself becomes more-or-less consolidated around the JIF. Using ethnographic materials from different research sites in Dutch University Medical Centers, this article sheds new empirical and theoretical light on how performance metrics variously shape biomedical research on the 'shop floor.' Our detailed analysis underscores a need for further research into the constitutive effects of evaluative metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 103247215
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rushforth%2C+Alexander%22">Rushforth, Alexander</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> a.d.rushforth@cwts.leidenuniv.nl</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rijcke%2C+Sarah%22">Rijcke, Sarah</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Minerva%3A+A+Review+of+Science%2C+Learning+%26+Policy%22">Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy</searchLink>. Jun2015, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p117-139. 23p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bibliometrics%22">Bibliometrics</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bibliography%22">Bibliography</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Methodology%22">Methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Key+performance+indicators+%28Management%29%22">Key performance indicators (Management)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+periodicals%22">Medical periodicals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+publishing%22">Medical publishing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Periodicals%22">Periodicals</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The range and types of performance metrics has recently proliferated in academic settings, with bibliometric indicators being particularly visible examples. One field that has traditionally been hospitable towards such indicators is biomedicine. Here the relative merits of bibliometrics are widely discussed, with debates often portraying them as heroes or villains. Despite a plethora of controversies, one of the most widely used indicators in this field is said to be the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). In this article we argue that much of the current debates around researchers' uses of the JIF in biomedicine can be classed as 'folk theories': explanatory accounts told among a community that seldom (if ever) get systematically checked. Such accounts rarely disclose how knowledge production itself becomes more-or-less consolidated around the JIF. Using ethnographic materials from different research sites in Dutch University Medical Centers, this article sheds new empirical and theoretical light on how performance metrics variously shape biomedical research on the 'shop floor.' Our detailed analysis underscores a need for further research into the constitutive effects of evaluative metrics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=103247215
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11024-015-9274-5
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 117
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Bibliometrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Bibliography
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Key performance indicators (Management)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical periodicals
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical publishing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Periodicals
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rushforth, Alexander
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rijcke, Sarah
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Text: Jun2015
              Type: published
              Y: 2015
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00264695
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 53
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning & Policy
              Type: main
ResultId 1