View in EDS

Development of PRIDe: A tool to assess physicians' preference of role in clinical decision making.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Development of PRIDe: A tool to assess physicians' preference of role in clinical decision making.
Authors: Giguère A (AUTHOR), Labrecque M (AUTHOR), Njoya M (AUTHOR), Thivierge R (AUTHOR), Légaré F (AUTHOR)
Source: Patient Education & Counseling. Aug2012, Vol. 88 Issue 2, p277-283. 7p.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate items for inclusion in PRIDe (Preferred Role in Decision Making), a new tool to assess changes of role preference among professionals exposed to training in shared decision making (SDM). METHODS: This study was part of a pilot trial to evaluate the effectiveness of SDM training on the doctors' prescription of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections. Thirty-nine family physicians were randomized to immediate exposure to training or to delayed exposure. Potential items for PRIDe and a questionnaire about physicians' intention to engage in SDM were administered at baseline and at follow-up. RESULTS: Following analysis, we retained five items that captured a change in physicians' preference. The items' scores were pooled and the resulting tool showed limited internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.41) but significant test-retest reliability (immediate group: P=0.03; delayed group: P=0.008) and acceptable discriminant validity, with patients involved in decision making more actively after training than before (Fisher's test, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: This initial step to develop an evaluation tool to assess changes in doctors' preference of role in decision making following SDM training shows promising results. The next step is to develop more clinical vignettes followed by questions inspired from this analysis. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The PRIDe instrument can be used in the assessment of health professionals' attitude towards shared decision making after training in shared decision making. Additional research is needed to evaluate its validity before it can be recommended for use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Patient Education & Counseling is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 104485712
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Development of PRIDe: A tool to assess physicians' preference of role in clinical decision making.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Giguère+A%22">Giguère A</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Labrecque+M%22">Labrecque M</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Njoya+M%22">Njoya M</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thivierge+R%22">Thivierge R</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Légaré+F%22">Légaré F</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Patient+Education+%26+Counseling%22">Patient Education & Counseling</searchLink>. Aug2012, Vol. 88 Issue 2, p277-283. 7p.
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate items for inclusion in PRIDe (Preferred Role in Decision Making), a new tool to assess changes of role preference among professionals exposed to training in shared decision making (SDM). METHODS: This study was part of a pilot trial to evaluate the effectiveness of SDM training on the doctors' prescription of antibiotics for acute respiratory infections. Thirty-nine family physicians were randomized to immediate exposure to training or to delayed exposure. Potential items for PRIDe and a questionnaire about physicians' intention to engage in SDM were administered at baseline and at follow-up. RESULTS: Following analysis, we retained five items that captured a change in physicians' preference. The items' scores were pooled and the resulting tool showed limited internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.41) but significant test-retest reliability (immediate group: P=0.03; delayed group: P=0.008) and acceptable discriminant validity, with patients involved in decision making more actively after training than before (Fisher's test, P=0.02). CONCLUSION: This initial step to develop an evaluation tool to assess changes in doctors' preference of role in decision making following SDM training shows promising results. The next step is to develop more clinical vignettes followed by questions inspired from this analysis. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The PRIDe instrument can be used in the assessment of health professionals' attitude towards shared decision making after training in shared decision making. Additional research is needed to evaluate its validity before it can be recommended for use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Patient Education & Counseling is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=104485712
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.003
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 277
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Development of PRIDe: A tool to assess physicians' preference of role in clinical decision making.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Giguère A
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Labrecque M
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Njoya M
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Thivierge R
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Légaré F
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2012
              Type: published
              Y: 2012
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07383991
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 88
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Patient Education & Counseling
              Type: main
ResultId 1