Halting in single word production: a test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring [corrected] [published erratum appears in J MEM LANG 2006 Aug;55(2):314].
Saved in:
| Title: | Halting in single word production: a test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring [corrected] [published erratum appears in J MEM LANG 2006 Aug;55(2):314]. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Slevc LR (AUTHOR), Ferreira VS (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Memory & Language. May2006, Vol. 54 Issue 4, p515-540. 26p. |
| Abstract: | The perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring (Levelt, 1983) claims that inner and overt speech are monitored by the comprehension system, which detects errors by comparing the comprehension of formulated utterances to originally intended utterances. To test the perceptual loop monitor, speakers named pictures and sometimes attempted to halt speech in response to auditory (Experiments 1 and 3) or visual (Experiments 2, 4, and 5) words that differed from the picture name. These stop-signal words were varied in terms of their semantic or phonological similarity to the intended word. The ability to halt word production was sensitive to phonological similarity and, in Experiment 5, to emotional valence, but not to semantic similarity. These results suggest that the perceptual loop detects errors by making comparisons at a level where phonological knowledge is represented. These data also imply that dialogue, back channeling, and other areas where speech production is affected by simultaneous comprehension may operate based on phonological comparisons. Copyright © 2006 by Elsevier Science (USA). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Memory & Language is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 106332755 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Halting in single word production: a test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring [corrected] [published erratum appears in J MEM LANG 2006 Aug;55(2):314]. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Slevc+LR%22">Slevc LR</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ferreira+VS%22">Ferreira VS</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Memory+%26+Language%22">Journal of Memory & Language</searchLink>. May2006, Vol. 54 Issue 4, p515-540. 26p. – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring (Levelt, 1983) claims that inner and overt speech are monitored by the comprehension system, which detects errors by comparing the comprehension of formulated utterances to originally intended utterances. To test the perceptual loop monitor, speakers named pictures and sometimes attempted to halt speech in response to auditory (Experiments 1 and 3) or visual (Experiments 2, 4, and 5) words that differed from the picture name. These stop-signal words were varied in terms of their semantic or phonological similarity to the intended word. The ability to halt word production was sensitive to phonological similarity and, in Experiment 5, to emotional valence, but not to semantic similarity. These results suggest that the perceptual loop detects errors by making comparisons at a level where phonological knowledge is represented. These data also imply that dialogue, back channeling, and other areas where speech production is affected by simultaneous comprehension may operate based on phonological comparisons. Copyright © 2006 by Elsevier Science (USA). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Memory & Language is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=106332755 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.002 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 26 StartPage: 515 Titles: – TitleFull: Halting in single word production: a test of the perceptual loop theory of speech monitoring [corrected] [published erratum appears in J MEM LANG 2006 Aug;55(2):314]. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Slevc LR – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ferreira VS IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2006 Type: published Y: 2006 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0749596X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 54 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Memory & Language Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
