Calibration of accelerometer output for adults.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Calibration of accelerometer output for adults.
Authors: Matthews CE (AUTHOR)
Source: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. Nov2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, pS512-22. 1p.
Abstract: This paper reviews the collective experience of monitor calibration studies in adults and seeks to answer the following questions: What has been done? What have we learned? What could be done to further enhance the comparability of results from future calibration research? Calibration studies in adults have typically used oxygen consumption as a criterion measure, similar types of source activities, and linear regression to obtain prediction equations that calibrate the activity counts to measured activity intensity levels. However, the methodological diversity of these studies has produced a great deal of variation in the resulting prediction equations and cut points, even when using the same monitor. Thus, data obtained from a relatively robust activity monitoring technology that captures many dynamic physical activities reasonably well have been splintered by the calibration process into a wide range of summary measures that are much less comparable than they could otherwise be. This heterogeneity in calibration results reduces our ability to interpret data obtained from accelerometers between different research groups, across the life span, between populations, and probably between the different monitor types. This report reviews and critiques methods typically used for developing calibration equations and determining activity count cut points for identifying specific intensities of PA among adults, and it highlights the need for flexible research methods that can enhance the comparability of results from future calibration studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 106409858
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Calibration of accelerometer output for adults.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Matthews+CE%22">Matthews CE</searchLink> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medicine+%26+Science+in+Sports+%26+Exercise%22">Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise</searchLink>. Nov2005 Supplement, Vol. 37, pS512-22. 1p.
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This paper reviews the collective experience of monitor calibration studies in adults and seeks to answer the following questions: What has been done? What have we learned? What could be done to further enhance the comparability of results from future calibration research? Calibration studies in adults have typically used oxygen consumption as a criterion measure, similar types of source activities, and linear regression to obtain prediction equations that calibrate the activity counts to measured activity intensity levels. However, the methodological diversity of these studies has produced a great deal of variation in the resulting prediction equations and cut points, even when using the same monitor. Thus, data obtained from a relatively robust activity monitoring technology that captures many dynamic physical activities reasonably well have been splintered by the calibration process into a wide range of summary measures that are much less comparable than they could otherwise be. This heterogeneity in calibration results reduces our ability to interpret data obtained from accelerometers between different research groups, across the life span, between populations, and probably between the different monitor types. This report reviews and critiques methods typically used for developing calibration equations and determining activity count cut points for identifying specific intensities of PA among adults, and it highlights the need for flexible research methods that can enhance the comparability of results from future calibration studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise is the property of Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=106409858
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 1
        StartPage: S512
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Calibration of accelerometer output for adults.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Matthews CE
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 02
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2005 Supplement
              Type: published
              Y: 2005
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01959131
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 37
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
              Type: main
ResultId 1