Improving research supervision in nursing.
Saved in:
| Title: | Improving research supervision in nursing. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Thompson DR (AUTHOR), Kirkman S (AUTHOR), Watson R (AUTHOR), Stewart S (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Nurse Education Today. May2005, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p283-290. 8p. |
| Abstract: | In this paper, four experienced researchers from the UK, China and Australia offer guidance in research supervision based on their experiences and the recent document, Improving standards in postgraduate research degree programmes [Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2003. Improving standards in postgraduate research degree programmes. Formal consultation. Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland, Higher Education Funding Council for England, Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council, HEFCE, London]. Supervision is an important aspect of not only the development of the neophyte researcher, but of academic staff and research activity in general. With increased academic accountability, good supervision should be an integral component of a quality research governance framework and resourced as such. Recommendations include: adoption of these standards; rigorous selection of research students and supervisors and development of projects; development of departmental procedures for monitoring, feedback and intellectual property; and transparency, rigour and fairness in examination procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Nurse Education Today is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 106491546 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Improving research supervision in nursing. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thompson+DR%22">Thompson DR</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kirkman+S%22">Kirkman S</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Watson+R%22">Watson R</searchLink> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stewart+S%22">Stewart S</searchLink> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Nurse+Education+Today%22">Nurse Education Today</searchLink>. May2005, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p283-290. 8p. – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In this paper, four experienced researchers from the UK, China and Australia offer guidance in research supervision based on their experiences and the recent document, Improving standards in postgraduate research degree programmes [Higher Education Funding Council for England, 2003. Improving standards in postgraduate research degree programmes. Formal consultation. Department for Employment and Learning, Northern Ireland, Higher Education Funding Council for England, Higher Education Funding Council for Wales, Scottish Higher Education Funding Council, HEFCE, London]. Supervision is an important aspect of not only the development of the neophyte researcher, but of academic staff and research activity in general. With increased academic accountability, good supervision should be an integral component of a quality research governance framework and resourced as such. Recommendations include: adoption of these standards; rigorous selection of research students and supervisors and development of projects; development of departmental procedures for monitoring, feedback and intellectual property; and transparency, rigour and fairness in examination procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Nurse Education Today is the property of Elsevier B.V. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=106491546 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.01.011 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 283 Titles: – TitleFull: Improving research supervision in nursing. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thompson DR – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kirkman S – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Watson R – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stewart S IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2005 Type: published Y: 2005 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 02606917 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 25 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Nurse Education Today Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
