Does Title-By-Title Selection Make a Difference? A Usage Analysis on Print Monograph Purchasing.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Does Title-By-Title Selection Make a Difference? A Usage Analysis on Print Monograph Purchasing.
Authors: Ke, Irene1, Gao, Wenli1, Bronicki, Jackie1
Source: Collection Management. Jan-Mar2017, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p34-47. 14p.
Subject Terms: *Collection development in libraries, *Library acquisitions, Approval plans in library acquisitions, Library circulation analysis, Acquisition of serial publications
Abstract: This article compares the usage of print monographs acquired through firm orders and approval plans to determine whether title-by-title book selection makes a difference. The circulation data of print monographs acquired in a four-year period were extracted and separated according to their acquisition methods. Usage data were analyzed according to the Library of Congress Classification system and library's three subject area groups (Humanities, Social Sciences, and Sciences). The results indicate that books acquired via firm orders had a higher circulation rate in almost all subject areas. The authors discuss how the findings can be used to inform future collection practices. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Copyright of Collection Management is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 121166546
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Does Title-By-Title Selection Make a Difference? A Usage Analysis on Print Monograph Purchasing.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ke%2C+Irene%22">Ke, Irene</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gao%2C+Wenli%22">Gao, Wenli</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bronicki%2C+Jackie%22">Bronicki, Jackie</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Collection+Management%22">Collection Management</searchLink>. Jan-Mar2017, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p34-47. 14p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Collection+development+in+libraries%22">Collection development in libraries</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+acquisitions%22">Library acquisitions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Approval+plans+in+library+acquisitions%22">Approval plans in library acquisitions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Library+circulation+analysis%22">Library circulation analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Acquisition+of+serial+publications%22">Acquisition of serial publications</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This article compares the usage of print monographs acquired through firm orders and approval plans to determine whether title-by-title book selection makes a difference. The circulation data of print monographs acquired in a four-year period were extracted and separated according to their acquisition methods. Usage data were analyzed according to the Library of Congress Classification system and library's three subject area groups (Humanities, Social Sciences, and Sciences). The results indicate that books acquired via firm orders had a higher circulation rate in almost all subject areas. The authors discuss how the findings can be used to inform future collection practices. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Collection Management is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=121166546
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/01462679.2016.1249040
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
        StartPage: 34
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Collection development in libraries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Library acquisitions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Approval plans in library acquisitions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Library circulation analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Acquisition of serial publications
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Does Title-By-Title Selection Make a Difference? A Usage Analysis on Print Monograph Purchasing.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ke, Irene
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gao, Wenli
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Bronicki, Jackie
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: Jan-Mar2017
              Type: published
              Y: 2017
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 01462679
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 42
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Collection Management
              Type: main
ResultId 1