Boundary-Spanner Role Conflict in Public Urban Universities.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Boundary-Spanner Role Conflict in Public Urban Universities.
Authors: Gauntner, Joseph1, Hansman, Catherine A.2
Source: Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement. 2017, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p104-131. 28p.
Subject Terms: *Urban universities & colleges, *Partnerships in education, Boundary spanning activity
Abstract: It is common for universities that seek community partnerships to employ full-time staff, formally sanctioned as boundary spanners, to develop and manage such partnerships. These staff are frequently administrative or allied staff rather than tenure-track faculty or academic unit administrators. Given the multiple interests of universities and their community partners, it seems likely that boundary spanners attempting to design mutually beneficial relationships will experience role conflict as they seek to align diverse community and institutional agendas. This qualitative study explored the experience of role conflict as reported by university staff boundary spanners. This study found that role conflict was an integral part of the boundary spanner role and that boundary spanners exhibited two responses to role conflict: formative responses, directed toward continuing to seek mutual benefit, and adaptive responses, wherein mutual benefit was not pursued. External factors impacting role conflict were also identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement is the property of University of Georgia, Office of the Vice President for Public Service & Outreach and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 122704695
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Boundary-Spanner Role Conflict in Public Urban Universities.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gauntner%2C+Joseph%22">Gauntner, Joseph</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hansman%2C+Catherine+A%2E%22">Hansman, Catherine A.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Higher+Education+Outreach+%26+Engagement%22">Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement</searchLink>. 2017, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p104-131. 28p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Urban+universities+%26+colleges%22">Urban universities & colleges</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Partnerships+in+education%22">Partnerships in education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Boundary+spanning+activity%22">Boundary spanning activity</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: It is common for universities that seek community partnerships to employ full-time staff, formally sanctioned as boundary spanners, to develop and manage such partnerships. These staff are frequently administrative or allied staff rather than tenure-track faculty or academic unit administrators. Given the multiple interests of universities and their community partners, it seems likely that boundary spanners attempting to design mutually beneficial relationships will experience role conflict as they seek to align diverse community and institutional agendas. This qualitative study explored the experience of role conflict as reported by university staff boundary spanners. This study found that role conflict was an integral part of the boundary spanner role and that boundary spanners exhibited two responses to role conflict: formative responses, directed toward continuing to seek mutual benefit, and adaptive responses, wherein mutual benefit was not pursued. External factors impacting role conflict were also identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement is the property of University of Georgia, Office of the Vice President for Public Service & Outreach and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=122704695
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 28
        StartPage: 104
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Urban universities & colleges
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Partnerships in education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Boundary spanning activity
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Boundary-Spanner Role Conflict in Public Urban Universities.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gauntner, Joseph
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hansman, Catherine A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Text: 2017
              Type: published
              Y: 2017
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15346102
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 21
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Higher Education Outreach & Engagement
              Type: main
ResultId 1