Key Authors in Business and Management Education Research: Productivity, Topics, and Future Directions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Key Authors in Business and Management Education Research: Productivity, Topics, and Future Directions.
Authors: Arbaugh, J. B.1 arbaugh@uwosh.edu, Asarta, Carlos J.2 asarta@udel.edu, Hwang, Alvin3 ahwang@pace.edu, Fornaciari, Charles J.4 fornaciari@lasalle.edu, Bento, Regina F.5 rbento@ubalt.edu, Dean, Kathy Lund6 lunddean@gustavus.edu
Source: Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education. Jul2017, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p268-302. 35p.
Subject Terms: *Business education, *Management education, *Education research, *Authorship, *Business schools
Abstract: ABSTRACT Previous studies of author productivity in business and management education (BME) research have focused on single disciplinary areas, and even single journals. This study is the first to examine the productivity of BME scholars across multiple disciplinary areas (i.e., accounting, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and operations/supply chain management). We analyzed a pool of 17 BME journals with the highest hg-index, by including the top three journals in the accounting and information systems areas, the top two journals in each of the other disciplinary areas, and an interdisciplinary BME journal. This examination covered a 10-year period (2005-2014), 4,464 articles and 9,617 article co-authors. We identified 7,209 unique authors in this pool and ranked their productivity to create a 'Key Authors' list. Each of the top 99 authors had five or more articles in our database. Our findings indicate the potential for cross-disciplinary dissemination of research ideas and opportunities for scholars to enhance their research profile, because even a small increase in productivity can lead to substantial movement in the BME rankings of authors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:ABSTRACT Previous studies of author productivity in business and management education (BME) research have focused on single disciplinary areas, and even single journals. This study is the first to examine the productivity of BME scholars across multiple disciplinary areas (i.e., accounting, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and operations/supply chain management). We analyzed a pool of 17 BME journals with the highest hg-index, by including the top three journals in the accounting and information systems areas, the top two journals in each of the other disciplinary areas, and an interdisciplinary BME journal. This examination covered a 10-year period (2005-2014), 4,464 articles and 9,617 article co-authors. We identified 7,209 unique authors in this pool and ranked their productivity to create a 'Key Authors' list. Each of the top 99 authors had five or more articles in our database. Our findings indicate the potential for cross-disciplinary dissemination of research ideas and opportunities for scholars to enhance their research profile, because even a small increase in productivity can lead to substantial movement in the BME rankings of authors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
ISSN:15404595
DOI:10.1111/dsji.12131