Private schooling and productivity in educational justice.
Saved in:
| Title: | Private schooling and productivity in educational justice. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Espindola, Juan1 juan.espindola@cide.edu |
| Source: | Theory & Research in Education. Jul2017, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p129-144. 16p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Educational equalization, *Educational productivity |
| People: | Swift, Adam, Brighouse, Harry, Anderson, Elizabeth, Satz, Debra |
| Abstract: | This article examines the debate between equity theorists (Adam Swift and Harry Brighouse) and adequacy theorists (Elizabeth Anderson and Debra Satz) over elite private schooling and productivity. It challenges the view, presupposed but never defended by adequacy theorists, that private schools can be justified on social productivity grounds, that is, on account of their ability to increase social wealth and thus benefit the least well-off. The article also argues against what it calls the sufficientarian productivity advantage. Contrary to what adequacy theorists claim, the equity approach does not neglect productivity considerations and, conversely, the adequacy approach exaggerates the extent to which it successfully accommodates the interest in productivity within its account of educational justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Theory & Research in Education is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 124227739 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Private schooling and productivity in educational justice. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Espindola%2C+Juan%22">Espindola, Juan</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> juan.espindola@cide.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Theory+%26+Research+in+Education%22">Theory & Research in Education</searchLink>. Jul2017, Vol. 15 Issue 2, p129-144. 16p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+equalization%22">Educational equalization</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+productivity%22">Educational productivity</searchLink> – Name: SubjectPerson Label: People Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="PE" term="%22Swift%2C+Adam%22">Swift, Adam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="PE" term="%22Brighouse%2C+Harry%22">Brighouse, Harry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="PE" term="%22Anderson%2C+Elizabeth%22">Anderson, Elizabeth</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="PE" term="%22Satz%2C+Debra%22">Satz, Debra</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This article examines the debate between equity theorists (Adam Swift and Harry Brighouse) and adequacy theorists (Elizabeth Anderson and Debra Satz) over elite private schooling and productivity. It challenges the view, presupposed but never defended by adequacy theorists, that private schools can be justified on social productivity grounds, that is, on account of their ability to increase social wealth and thus benefit the least well-off. The article also argues against what it calls the sufficientarian productivity advantage. Contrary to what adequacy theorists claim, the equity approach does not neglect productivity considerations and, conversely, the adequacy approach exaggerates the extent to which it successfully accommodates the interest in productivity within its account of educational justice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Theory & Research in Education is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=124227739 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/1477878517713339 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 129 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational equalization Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational productivity Type: general – SubjectFull: Swift, Adam Type: general – SubjectFull: Brighouse, Harry Type: general – SubjectFull: Anderson, Elizabeth Type: general – SubjectFull: Satz, Debra Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Private schooling and productivity in educational justice. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Espindola, Juan IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul2017 Type: published Y: 2017 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 14778785 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 15 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Theory & Research in Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
