View in EDS

Structure and content of Native American stereotypic subgroups: Not just (ig)noble.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Structure and content of Native American stereotypic subgroups: Not just (ig)noble.
Authors: Burkley, Edward1 ed.burkley@okstate.edu, Fiske, Susan T.2, Durante, Federica3, Burkley, Melissa1, Andrade, Angela4
Source: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology. Apr2017, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p209-219. 11p.
Subject Terms: *Discrimination (Sociology), *Labeling theory, *Native American college students, *Emotions, *Sensory perception, *Students, Stereotypes, Social psychology, Psychology of Native Americans, Self-perception
Abstract: Objectives: Prejudice against Native Americans as an overall group generally polarizes into positive and negative stereotypic extremes, but distinct subgroups may explain this variability.Method: Using college student samples (Study 1), a preliminary study identified common Native American subgroups and then a main study (N = 153, 74% women, 73% White, mean age = 19 years) had participants rate these subgroups on basic dimensions of stereotype content (i.e., warmth and competence), elicited emotions (e.g., admiration, contempt), and elicited behaviors (e.g., facilitation, harm). In Study 2, these preliminary study and main study procedures were replicated using nationwide samples (main study: N = 139, 51% women, 78% White, mean age = 35 years).Results: For the most part, similar Native American subgroups emerged in both samples. Using the stereotype content model (SCM; Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002), the subgroups were found to vary along a competence-by-warmth space. The majority of subgroups (e.g., alcoholics, lazy) were judged low in both competence and warmth. Additional subgroups (e.g., casino operators, warriors) were ambivalently judged as high on competence but low on warmth. Subgroups perceived as high in both competence and warmth elicited more admiration, those low in both competence and warmth elicited more contempt, those high in competence elicited more passive facilitation and less passive harm, and those high in warmth elicited more active facilitation and less active harm.Conclusions: Native American stereotypes are apparently characterized by both noble and ignoble subgroups, highlighting the importance of studying stereotypes at the subgroup level. (PsycINFO Database Record [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology is the property of American Psychological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 124763540
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Structure and content of Native American stereotypic subgroups: Not just (ig)noble.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burkley%2C+Edward%22">Burkley, Edward</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> ed.burkley@okstate.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fiske%2C+Susan+T%2E%22">Fiske, Susan T.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Durante%2C+Federica%22">Durante, Federica</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burkley%2C+Melissa%22">Burkley, Melissa</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrade%2C+Angela%22">Andrade, Angela</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Cultural+Diversity+%26+Ethnic+Minority+Psychology%22">Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology</searchLink>. Apr2017, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p209-219. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discrimination+%28Sociology%29%22">Discrimination (Sociology)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Labeling+theory%22">Labeling theory</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Native+American+college+students%22">Native American college students</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emotions%22">Emotions</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sensory+perception%22">Sensory perception</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students%22">Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stereotypes%22">Stereotypes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+psychology%22">Social psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+of+Native+Americans%22">Psychology of Native Americans</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self-perception%22">Self-perception</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: <bold>Objectives: </bold>Prejudice against Native Americans as an overall group generally polarizes into positive and negative stereotypic extremes, but distinct subgroups may explain this variability.<bold>Method: </bold>Using college student samples (Study 1), a preliminary study identified common Native American subgroups and then a main study (N = 153, 74% women, 73% White, mean age = 19 years) had participants rate these subgroups on basic dimensions of stereotype content (i.e., warmth and competence), elicited emotions (e.g., admiration, contempt), and elicited behaviors (e.g., facilitation, harm). In Study 2, these preliminary study and main study procedures were replicated using nationwide samples (main study: N = 139, 51% women, 78% White, mean age = 35 years).<bold>Results: </bold>For the most part, similar Native American subgroups emerged in both samples. Using the stereotype content model (SCM; Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002), the subgroups were found to vary along a competence-by-warmth space. The majority of subgroups (e.g., alcoholics, lazy) were judged low in both competence and warmth. Additional subgroups (e.g., casino operators, warriors) were ambivalently judged as high on competence but low on warmth. Subgroups perceived as high in both competence and warmth elicited more admiration, those low in both competence and warmth elicited more contempt, those high in competence elicited more passive facilitation and less passive harm, and those high in warmth elicited more active facilitation and less active harm.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Native American stereotypes are apparently characterized by both noble and ignoble subgroups, highlighting the importance of studying stereotypes at the subgroup level. (PsycINFO Database Record [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology is the property of American Psychological Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=124763540
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/cdp0000100
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 209
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Discrimination (Sociology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Labeling theory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Native American college students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emotions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Sensory perception
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stereotypes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social psychology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology of Native Americans
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self-perception
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Structure and content of Native American stereotypic subgroups: Not just (ig)noble.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burkley, Edward
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fiske, Susan T.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Durante, Federica
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burkley, Melissa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Andrade, Angela
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Text: Apr2017
              Type: published
              Y: 2017
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10999809
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 23
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1