How and when team regulatory focus influences team innovation and member creativity.
Saved in:
| Title: | How and when team regulatory focus influences team innovation and member creativity. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Li, Ci-Rong1,2 cirongli@gmail.com, Li, Chun-Xuan1,2 d9532001@gmail.com, Lin, Chen-Ju1,2 jzlin0208@gmail.com |
| Source: | Personnel Review. 2018, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p95-117. 23p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Bureaucracy, Teams in the workplace, Innovations in business, Creative ability in business, Innovation management |
| Abstract: | Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test how team regulatory focus may relate to individual creativity and team innovation; and address the fit/misfit issue of team regulatory focus and team bureaucracy.Design/methodology/approach The authors collected data from 377 members and their leaders within 56 R&D teams in two Taiwanese companies.Findings A team promotion focus was positively related, whereas a team prevention focus was negatively related, to both team innovation and member creativity through team perspective taking and employee information elaboration, respectively. Furthermore, team bureaucracy played a moderating role that suppressed the indirect relationship between team regulatory focus and creativity.Originality/value This is one of first studies to explore an underlying mechanism linking team regulatory focus and both team innovation and member creativity. The authors provide a more complete view of the creative and innovation implications of team-level self-regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Personnel Review is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 127876770 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How and when team regulatory focus influences team innovation and member creativity. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Ci-Rong%22">Li, Ci-Rong</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> cirongli@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li%2C+Chun-Xuan%22">Li, Chun-Xuan</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> d9532001@gmail.com</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lin%2C+Chen-Ju%22">Lin, Chen-Ju</searchLink><relatesTo>1,2</relatesTo><i> jzlin0208@gmail.com</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Personnel+Review%22">Personnel Review</searchLink>. 2018, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p95-117. 23p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bureaucracy%22">Bureaucracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teams+in+the+workplace%22">Teams in the workplace</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Innovations+in+business%22">Innovations in business</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creative+ability+in+business%22">Creative ability in business</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Innovation+management%22">Innovation management</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test how team regulatory focus may relate to individual creativity and team innovation; and address the fit/misfit issue of team regulatory focus and team bureaucracy.Design/methodology/approach The authors collected data from 377 members and their leaders within 56 R&D teams in two Taiwanese companies.Findings A team promotion focus was positively related, whereas a team prevention focus was negatively related, to both team innovation and member creativity through team perspective taking and employee information elaboration, respectively. Furthermore, team bureaucracy played a moderating role that suppressed the indirect relationship between team regulatory focus and creativity.Originality/value This is one of first studies to explore an underlying mechanism linking team regulatory focus and both team innovation and member creativity. The authors provide a more complete view of the creative and innovation implications of team-level self-regulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Personnel Review is the property of Emerald Publishing Limited and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=127876770 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1108/PR-09-2016-0236 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 95 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Bureaucracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Teams in the workplace Type: general – SubjectFull: Innovations in business Type: general – SubjectFull: Creative ability in business Type: general – SubjectFull: Innovation management Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How and when team regulatory focus influences team innovation and member creativity. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Li, Ci-Rong – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Li, Chun-Xuan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lin, Chen-Ju IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: 2018 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00483486 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 47 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Personnel Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
