Word processors as monarchs: Computer-generated feedback can exercise power over and influence EAL learners' identity representations.
Saved in:
| Title: | Word processors as monarchs: Computer-generated feedback can exercise power over and influence EAL learners' identity representations. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Zaini, Amin1 aminzaini1985@gmail.com |
| Source: | Computers & Education. May2018, Vol. 120, p112-126. 15p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Errors, Word processors (Machinery), English language, Writing, Intertextual analysis |
| Abstract: | While the efficacy of computer-generated feedback in affecting learners' scores, errors, and writing skills has already been established, the impact of such feedback on learners' identity representations remains unexplored. The current paper explores the ways in which computer-generated feedback from Microsoft Word Office™ (MWO) and Grammarly influences English as an Additional Language (EAL) learners' identity representations while writing on a screen. To this end three participants were involved in a case study whereby they were asked to complete five writing tasks. Power relations, intertextuality and multimodality levels, and attitudes — in their technical sense — as relevant concepts were employed to explore potential factors that influence EAL writers’ identity representations. The results obtained from think-aloud sessions and interviews show that while the participants relied on computer-generated feedback to spell correctly and to make well-formed sentences, they experienced pressures, control and power from automatic feedback, which subsequently influenced their identity representations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Computers & Education is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 128277840 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Word processors as monarchs: Computer-generated feedback can exercise power over and influence EAL learners' identity representations. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zaini%2C+Amin%22">Zaini, Amin</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> aminzaini1985@gmail.com</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Computers+%26+Education%22">Computers & Education</searchLink>. May2018, Vol. 120, p112-126. 15p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Errors%22">Errors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Word+processors+%28Machinery%29%22">Word processors (Machinery)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+language%22">English language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing%22">Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intertextual+analysis%22">Intertextual analysis</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: While the efficacy of computer-generated feedback in affecting learners' scores, errors, and writing skills has already been established, the impact of such feedback on learners' identity representations remains unexplored. The current paper explores the ways in which computer-generated feedback from Microsoft Word Office™ (MWO) and Grammarly influences English as an Additional Language (EAL) learners' identity representations while writing on a screen. To this end three participants were involved in a case study whereby they were asked to complete five writing tasks. Power relations, intertextuality and multimodality levels, and attitudes — in their technical sense — as relevant concepts were employed to explore potential factors that influence EAL writers’ identity representations. The results obtained from think-aloud sessions and interviews show that while the participants relied on computer-generated feedback to spell correctly and to make well-formed sentences, they experienced pressures, control and power from automatic feedback, which subsequently influenced their identity representations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Computers & Education is the property of Pergamon Press - An Imprint of Elsevier Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=128277840 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.014 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 112 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Errors Type: general – SubjectFull: Word processors (Machinery) Type: general – SubjectFull: English language Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Intertextual analysis Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Word processors as monarchs: Computer-generated feedback can exercise power over and influence EAL learners' identity representations. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zaini, Amin IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2018 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 03601315 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 120 Titles: – TitleFull: Computers & Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |