The Logic of Deferral: Educational Aims and Intellectual Disability.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Logic of Deferral: Educational Aims and Intellectual Disability. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Taylor, Ashley1 ataylor1@colgate.edu |
| Source: | Studies in Philosophy & Education. May2018, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p265-285. 21p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Intellectual disabilities, *Students with disabilities, *Curriculum, *Children, *Education, *Social conditions of students, Adaptability (Personality), Philosophers |
| Abstract: | The educational aims described by educational philosophers rarely embrace the full range of differences in intellectual ability, adaptive behavior, or communication that children exhibit. Because envisioned educational aims have significant consequences for how educational practices, pedagogy, and curricula are conceptualized, the failure to acknowledge and embrace differences in ability leaves open the question of the extent to which students with intellectual disabilities are subject to the same aims as their “typically-developing” peers. In articulating and defending valued aims of education, educational philosophers tacitly or expressly concede that particular aims will be ill suited to many children with intellectual disabilities, and that separate aims will therefore apply to them. This paper evaluates the philosophical reasoning behind this conclusion that some people, by necessity, must be governed by separate educational aims, to be decided separately and secondarily. The author calls this the “deferral stance.” First, the paper outlines concerns about a particular ability-biased social and epistemic context in which theorizing about educational aims takes place. The author then examines assumptions that underpin the logic of deferral, arguing that the logic proves flawed when subjected to conceptual and empirical scrutiny. The paper concludes by outlining an inclusive approach—the affirmative stance—to theorizing about educational aims that resists the logic of exclusion and deferral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Studies in Philosophy & Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 128889002 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Logic of Deferral: Educational Aims and Intellectual Disability. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Taylor%2C+Ashley%22">Taylor, Ashley</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> ataylor1@colgate.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Studies+in+Philosophy+%26+Education%22">Studies in Philosophy & Education</searchLink>. May2018, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p265-285. 21p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intellectual+disabilities%22">Intellectual disabilities</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students+with+disabilities%22">Students with disabilities</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Children%22">Children</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education%22">Education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+conditions+of+students%22">Social conditions of students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adaptability+%28Personality%29%22">Adaptability (Personality)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophers%22">Philosophers</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The educational aims described by educational philosophers rarely embrace the full range of differences in intellectual ability, adaptive behavior, or communication that children exhibit. Because envisioned educational aims have significant consequences for how educational practices, pedagogy, and curricula are conceptualized, the failure to acknowledge and embrace differences in ability leaves open the question of the extent to which students with intellectual disabilities are subject to the same aims as their “typically-developing” peers. In articulating and defending valued aims of education, educational philosophers tacitly or expressly concede that particular aims will be ill suited to many children with intellectual disabilities, and that separate aims will therefore apply to them. This paper evaluates the philosophical reasoning behind this conclusion that some people, by necessity, must be governed by separate educational aims, to be decided separately and secondarily. The author calls this the “deferral stance.” First, the paper outlines concerns about a particular ability-biased social and epistemic context in which theorizing about educational aims takes place. The author then examines assumptions that underpin the logic of deferral, arguing that the logic proves flawed when subjected to conceptual and empirical scrutiny. The paper concludes by outlining an inclusive approach—the affirmative stance—to theorizing about educational aims that resists the logic of exclusion and deferral. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Studies in Philosophy & Education is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=128889002 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s11217-017-9595-y Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 265 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Intellectual disabilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Students with disabilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Type: general – SubjectFull: Children Type: general – SubjectFull: Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Social conditions of students Type: general – SubjectFull: Adaptability (Personality) Type: general – SubjectFull: Philosophers Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Logic of Deferral: Educational Aims and Intellectual Disability. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Taylor, Ashley IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 05 Text: May2018 Type: published Y: 2018 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00393746 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 37 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Studies in Philosophy & Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |