Do Competitive Examinations Promote Diversity in Civil Service?
Saved in:
| Title: | Do Competitive Examinations Promote Diversity in Civil Service? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Greenan, Nathalie1 (AUTHOR) nathalie.greenan@lecnam.net, Lanfranchi, Joseph2 (AUTHOR) joseph.lanfranchi@u-paris2.fr, L'Horty, Yannick3 (AUTHOR) yannick.lhorty@u-pem.fr, Narcy, Mathieu1 (AUTHOR) mathieu.narcy@lecnam.net, Pierné, Guillaume4 (AUTHOR) guillaume.pierne@univ.angers.fr |
| Source: | Public Administration Review. May/Jun2019, Vol. 79 Issue 3, p370-382. 13p. 4 Charts. |
| Subject Terms: | *Cultural pluralism, *Competition (Psychology), *Civil service, Civil service examinations, Equality & society, Cognitive bias |
| Geographic Terms: | France |
| Abstract: | The representative bureaucracy literature provides a growing body of empirical evidence that a representative public workforce enhances the efficacy and legitimacy of public services. However, little attention has been paid to the capacity of civil service competitive examinations to give equal opportunity of access to public jobs to equally competent citizens. To fill this gap, the authors use French databases to analyze whether competitive examinations comprising both written and oral tests ensure equality of treatment for all candidates regardless of gender, place of residence, or place of birth. The results challenge the capacity of these examinations to treat candidates equally, identifying inequalities in the written tests as well as evaluation biases in the oral tests. However, oral evaluation biases tend to offset inequalities in the written tests. Therefore, selection boards take a sort of affirmative action toward the sole successful members of groups suffering such inequalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Public Administration Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The representative bureaucracy literature provides a growing body of empirical evidence that a representative public workforce enhances the efficacy and legitimacy of public services. However, little attention has been paid to the capacity of civil service competitive examinations to give equal opportunity of access to public jobs to equally competent citizens. To fill this gap, the authors use French databases to analyze whether competitive examinations comprising both written and oral tests ensure equality of treatment for all candidates regardless of gender, place of residence, or place of birth. The results challenge the capacity of these examinations to treat candidates equally, identifying inequalities in the written tests as well as evaluation biases in the oral tests. However, oral evaluation biases tend to offset inequalities in the written tests. Therefore, selection boards take a sort of affirmative action toward the sole successful members of groups suffering such inequalities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 00333352 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/puar.13053 |
