The uneasy place of equity in higher education: tracing its (in)significance in academic promotions.
Saved in:
| Title: | The uneasy place of equity in higher education: tracing its (in)significance in academic promotions. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Barrow, Mark1 (AUTHOR) m.barrow@auckland.ac.nz, Grant, Barbara1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Higher Education (00181560). Jul2019, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p133-147. 15p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Educational equalization, *Academic tenure, *College teachers, *Decision making, *Higher education, *Adults, Employee promotions |
| Abstract: | Throughout the West, efforts to achieve equity for students in higher education have met with mixed success. Much extant literature focuses on the position and perspectives of students in relation to this wicked problem: our research turns the spotlight onto the role of academic staff. In an effort to understand equity's mixed fortunes more forensically, this article offers a case study from a research-intensive university in Aotearoa New Zealand. The study outlines the current context of ideas about equity in national government and institutional policies, then traces the life of those ideas inside one particular yet ubiquitous institutional process: the promotion of academic staff. Promotion is a potent moment of academic subject formation where, in order to participate, individuals must account for themselves as promotion-worthy through presenting a comprehensive dossier in response to a detailed set of norms. Our research explores the extent to which institutional promotion processes suggest the necessity of an "equity-active academic subject" as well as the kinds of equity-active subjects who emerge. Our analysis of institutional documents and interviews with colleagues involved in promotion decision-making processes suggests that, despite an inevitable institutional rhetoric of commitment to equity, the concept occupies an uneasy, even risky, place in the academic promotion process, and that responsibility for equity remains largely stuck to equity bodies. This small study contributes to a deeper understanding of the obstacles—contradictions even—equity faces within university culture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Higher Education (00181560) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 137339133 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The uneasy place of equity in higher education: tracing its (in)significance in academic promotions. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Barrow%2C+Mark%22">Barrow, Mark</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> m.barrow@auckland.ac.nz</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Grant%2C+Barbara%22">Grant, Barbara</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Higher+Education+%2800181560%29%22">Higher Education (00181560)</searchLink>. Jul2019, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p133-147. 15p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+equalization%22">Educational equalization</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+tenure%22">Academic tenure</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+teachers%22">College teachers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+making%22">Decision making</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+education%22">Higher education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+promotions%22">Employee promotions</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Throughout the West, efforts to achieve equity for students in higher education have met with mixed success. Much extant literature focuses on the position and perspectives of students in relation to this wicked problem: our research turns the spotlight onto the role of academic staff. In an effort to understand equity's mixed fortunes more forensically, this article offers a case study from a research-intensive university in Aotearoa New Zealand. The study outlines the current context of ideas about equity in national government and institutional policies, then traces the life of those ideas inside one particular yet ubiquitous institutional process: the promotion of academic staff. Promotion is a potent moment of academic subject formation where, in order to participate, individuals must account for themselves as promotion-worthy through presenting a comprehensive dossier in response to a detailed set of norms. Our research explores the extent to which institutional promotion processes suggest the necessity of an "equity-active academic subject" as well as the kinds of equity-active subjects who emerge. Our analysis of institutional documents and interviews with colleagues involved in promotion decision-making processes suggests that, despite an inevitable institutional rhetoric of commitment to equity, the concept occupies an uneasy, even risky, place in the academic promotion process, and that responsibility for equity remains largely stuck to equity bodies. This small study contributes to a deeper understanding of the obstacles—contradictions even—equity faces within university culture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Higher Education (00181560) is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=137339133 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10734-018-0334-2 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 133 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Educational equalization Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic tenure Type: general – SubjectFull: College teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision making Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher education Type: general – SubjectFull: Adults Type: general – SubjectFull: Employee promotions Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The uneasy place of equity in higher education: tracing its (in)significance in academic promotions. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Barrow, Mark – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Grant, Barbara IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Text: Jul2019 Type: published Y: 2019 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 00181560 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 78 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Higher Education (00181560) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
