Student resistance in the classroom—Functional‐instrumentalist, critical‐emancipatory and critical‐functional conceptualisations.
Saved in:
| Title: | Student resistance in the classroom—Functional‐instrumentalist, critical‐emancipatory and critical‐functional conceptualisations. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Winkler, Ingo1, Rybnikova, Irma2 |
| Source: | Higher Education Quarterly. Oct2019, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p521-538. 18p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Higher education, *Educational background, *Education research, Psychological typologies, Empirical research |
| Abstract (English): | The paper provides a systemic literature review and a typology of texts that discuss student resistance in the classroom in Higher Education. Analysing 134 empirical and conceptual studies published between 1988 and 2018 for how student resistance is conceptualised, this review identifies three approaches: functional‐instrumentalist, critical‐emancipatory and critical‐functional. Presenting the three approaches in more depth, the article points to the main tenets, like supposed reasons for and suggested ways of handling student resistance. In the final part of the analysis, the paper discusses the typology in light of the current institutional background of Higher Education, including the managerial university and ambivalences of critical education. Finally, the article offers future research directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Abstract (German): | Abstrakt: Der Aufsatz bietet eine systematische Übersicht der Literatur, die den Widerstand von Studierenden in der Hochschulausbildung diskutiert. Es werden 134 empirische und konzeptionelle Studien analysiert, die zwischen 1988 und 2018 veröffentlicht wurden, um herauszufinden, wie die Literatur Widerstand von Studierenden konzeptualisiert. Dabei werden drei Ansätze identifiziert: funktional‐instrumentalistisch, kritisch‐emanzipatorisch und kritisch‐funktional. Der Artikel stellt diese Ansätze vor, indem er deren wichtigsten Grundsätze erläutert, wie zum Beispiel vermutete Gründe von sowie vorgeschlagene Methoden für den Umgang mit studentischem Widerstand. Im letzten Teil des Artikels wird die Typologie im Lichte des aktuellen institutionellen Hintergrunds der Hochschulausbildung diskutiert; einschließlich der managerialen Steuerung von Universitäten und der Ambivalenzen der kritischen Bildung. Schließlich erörtert der Artikel zukünftige Forschungsrichtungen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Higher Education Quarterly is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| Abstract: | The paper provides a systemic literature review and a typology of texts that discuss student resistance in the classroom in Higher Education. Analysing 134 empirical and conceptual studies published between 1988 and 2018 for how student resistance is conceptualised, this review identifies three approaches: functional‐instrumentalist, critical‐emancipatory and critical‐functional. Presenting the three approaches in more depth, the article points to the main tenets, like supposed reasons for and suggested ways of handling student resistance. In the final part of the analysis, the paper discusses the typology in light of the current institutional background of Higher Education, including the managerial university and ambivalences of critical education. Finally, the article offers future research directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 09515224 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/hequ.12219 |
