View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Why Higher Working Memory Capacity May Help You Learn: Sampling, Search, and Degrees of Approximation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Why Higher Working Memory Capacity May Help You Learn: Sampling, Search, and Degrees of Approximation.
Authors: Lloyd, Kevin1 (AUTHOR) klloyd@tue.mpg.de, Sanborn, Adam2 (AUTHOR), Leslie, David3 (AUTHOR), Lewandowsky, Stephan4 (AUTHOR)
Source: Cognitive Science. Dec2019, Vol. 43 Issue 12, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Subject Terms: *Short-term memory, *Individual differences, *Learning ability
Abstract: Algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference, such as those based on sampling (i.e., Monte Carlo methods), provide a natural source of models of how people may deal with uncertainty with limited cognitive resources. Here, we consider the idea that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) may be usefully modeled in terms of the number of samples, or "particles," available to perform inference. To test this idea, we focus on two recent experiments that report positive associations between WMC and two distinct aspects of categorization performance: the ability to learn novel categories, and the ability to switch between different categorization strategies ("knowledge restructuring"). In favor of the idea of modeling WMC as a number of particles, we show that a single model can reproduce both experimental results by varying the number of particles—increasing the number of particles leads to both faster category learning and improved strategy‐switching. Furthermore, when we fit the model to individual participants, we found a positive association between WMC and best‐fit number of particles for strategy switching. However, no association between WMC and best‐fit number of particles was found for category learning. These results are discussed in the context of the general challenge of disentangling the contributions of different potential sources of behavioral variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Cognitive Science is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 140459439
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Why Higher Working Memory Capacity May Help You Learn: Sampling, Search, and Degrees of Approximation.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lloyd%2C+Kevin%22">Lloyd, Kevin</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> klloyd@tue.mpg.de</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sanborn%2C+Adam%22">Sanborn, Adam</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leslie%2C+David%22">Leslie, David</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lewandowsky%2C+Stephan%22">Lewandowsky, Stephan</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Cognitive+Science%22">Cognitive Science</searchLink>. Dec2019, Vol. 43 Issue 12, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Short-term+memory%22">Short-term memory</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+differences%22">Individual differences</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+ability%22">Learning ability</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Algorithms for approximate Bayesian inference, such as those based on sampling (i.e., Monte Carlo methods), provide a natural source of models of how people may deal with uncertainty with limited cognitive resources. Here, we consider the idea that individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) may be usefully modeled in terms of the number of samples, or "particles," available to perform inference. To test this idea, we focus on two recent experiments that report positive associations between WMC and two distinct aspects of categorization performance: the ability to learn novel categories, and the ability to switch between different categorization strategies ("knowledge restructuring"). In favor of the idea of modeling WMC as a number of particles, we show that a single model can reproduce both experimental results by varying the number of particles—increasing the number of particles leads to both faster category learning and improved strategy‐switching. Furthermore, when we fit the model to individual participants, we found a positive association between WMC and best‐fit number of particles for strategy switching. However, no association between WMC and best‐fit number of particles was found for category learning. These results are discussed in the context of the general challenge of disentangling the contributions of different potential sources of behavioral variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Cognitive Science is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=140459439
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/cogs.12805
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 1
        StartPage: N.PAG
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Short-term memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Individual differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning ability
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Why Higher Working Memory Capacity May Help You Learn: Sampling, Search, and Degrees of Approximation.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lloyd, Kevin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sanborn, Adam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leslie, David
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lewandowsky, Stephan
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Dec2019
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03640213
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 43
            – Type: issue
              Value: 12
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Cognitive Science
              Type: main
ResultId 1