Digital Module 18: Automated Scoring https://ncme.elevate.commpartners.com.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Digital Module 18: Automated Scoring https://ncme.elevate.commpartners.com.
Authors: Lottridge, Sue1 (AUTHOR), Burkhardt, Amy2 (AUTHOR), Boyer, Michelle3 (AUTHOR)
Source: Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice. Fall2020, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p141-142. 2p.
Subject Terms: *Educational tests & measurements, *Algorithms, Web-based user interfaces, Logical prediction, Hyperlinks
Abstract: In this digital ITEMS module, Dr. Sue Lottridge, Amy Burkhardt, and Dr. Michelle Boyer provide an overview of automated scoring. Automated scoring is the use of computer algorithms to score unconstrained open‐ended test items by mimicking human scoring. The use of automated scoring is increasing in educational assessment programs because it allows scores to be returned faster at lower cost. In the module, they discuss automated scoring from a number of perspectives. First, they discuss benefits and weaknesses of automated scoring, and what psychometricians should know about automated scoring. Next, they describe the overall process of automated scoring, moving from data collection to engine training to operational scoring. Then, they describe how automated scoring systems work, including the basic functions around score prediction as well as other flagging methods. Finally, they conclude with a discussion of the specific validity demands around automated scoring and how they align with the larger validity demands around test scores. Two data activities are provided. The first is an interactive activity that allows the user to train and evaluate a simple automated scoring engine. The second is a worked example that examines the impact of rater error on test scores. The digital module contains a link to an interactive web application as well as its R‐Shiny code, diagnostic quiz questions, activities, curated resources, and a glossary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 145698234
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Digital Module 18: Automated Scoring https://ncme.elevate.commpartners.com.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lottridge%2C+Sue%22">Lottridge, Sue</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burkhardt%2C+Amy%22">Burkhardt, Amy</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Boyer%2C+Michelle%22">Boyer, Michelle</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Educational+Measurement%3A+Issues+%26+Practice%22">Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice</searchLink>. Fall2020, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p141-142. 2p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+tests+%26+measurements%22">Educational tests & measurements</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Algorithms%22">Algorithms</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Web-based+user+interfaces%22">Web-based user interfaces</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logical+prediction%22">Logical prediction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hyperlinks%22">Hyperlinks</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In this digital ITEMS module, Dr. Sue Lottridge, Amy Burkhardt, and Dr. Michelle Boyer provide an overview of automated scoring. Automated scoring is the use of computer algorithms to score unconstrained open‐ended test items by mimicking human scoring. The use of automated scoring is increasing in educational assessment programs because it allows scores to be returned faster at lower cost. In the module, they discuss automated scoring from a number of perspectives. First, they discuss benefits and weaknesses of automated scoring, and what psychometricians should know about automated scoring. Next, they describe the overall process of automated scoring, moving from data collection to engine training to operational scoring. Then, they describe how automated scoring systems work, including the basic functions around score prediction as well as other flagging methods. Finally, they conclude with a discussion of the specific validity demands around automated scoring and how they align with the larger validity demands around test scores. Two data activities are provided. The first is an interactive activity that allows the user to train and evaluate a simple automated scoring engine. The second is a worked example that examines the impact of rater error on test scores. The digital module contains a link to an interactive web application as well as its R‐Shiny code, diagnostic quiz questions, activities, curated resources, and a glossary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=145698234
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/emip.12388
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 2
        StartPage: 141
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Educational tests & measurements
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Algorithms
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Web-based user interfaces
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Logical prediction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hyperlinks
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Digital Module 18: Automated Scoring https://ncme.elevate.commpartners.com.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lottridge, Sue
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Burkhardt, Amy
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Boyer, Michelle
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Fall2020
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 07311745
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 39
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1