The Moral Hazards of Using Turnitin as a Learning Tool.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Moral Hazards of Using Turnitin as a Learning Tool.
Authors: Pavelich, Andrew
Source: Teaching Ethics. Fall2019, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p195-206. 12p.
Subject Terms: *Service learning, *Plagiarism, Moral hazard
Abstract: Plagiarism detection service like Turnitin can be powerful tools to help faculty evaluate whether a student's paper is plagiarized. But there's another side to Turnitin: The service promotes itself as a way to help teach students how to avoid plagiarism. I argue that the use of plagiarism detection services as learning tools actually contributes to the problem of plagiarism, by encouraging the idea that original papers are the goal of a class, instead of instruments to assess a student's ability to understand the class material. In addition, giving students access to the very tool that professors use to evaluate the authenticity of a paper allows students to use the tool to intentionally plagiarize in a way that passes the test. While plagiarism-detection services can help professors investigate suspected acts of plagiarism, they should not be used as a tool to teach students how to write papers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Teaching Ethics is the property of Philosophy Documentation Center and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 147042913
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Moral Hazards of Using Turnitin as a Learning Tool.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pavelich%2C+Andrew%22">Pavelich, Andrew</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Teaching+Ethics%22">Teaching Ethics</searchLink>. Fall2019, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p195-206. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Service+learning%22">Service learning</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Plagiarism%22">Plagiarism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+hazard%22">Moral hazard</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Plagiarism detection service like Turnitin can be powerful tools to help faculty evaluate whether a student's paper is plagiarized. But there's another side to Turnitin: The service promotes itself as a way to help teach students how to avoid plagiarism. I argue that the use of plagiarism detection services as learning tools actually contributes to the problem of plagiarism, by encouraging the idea that original papers are the goal of a class, instead of instruments to assess a student's ability to understand the class material. In addition, giving students access to the very tool that professors use to evaluate the authenticity of a paper allows students to use the tool to intentionally plagiarize in a way that passes the test. While plagiarism-detection services can help professors investigate suspected acts of plagiarism, they should not be used as a tool to teach students how to write papers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Teaching Ethics is the property of Philosophy Documentation Center and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=147042913
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.5840/tej20209979
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 195
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Service learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Plagiarism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Moral hazard
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Moral Hazards of Using Turnitin as a Learning Tool.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pavelich, Andrew
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Fall2019
              Type: published
              Y: 2019
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 15444031
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 19
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Teaching Ethics
              Type: main
ResultId 1