The Moral Hazards of Using Turnitin as a Learning Tool.
Saved in:
| Title: | The Moral Hazards of Using Turnitin as a Learning Tool. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Pavelich, Andrew |
| Source: | Teaching Ethics. Fall2019, Vol. 19 Issue 2, p195-206. 12p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Service learning, *Plagiarism, Moral hazard |
| Abstract: | Plagiarism detection service like Turnitin can be powerful tools to help faculty evaluate whether a student's paper is plagiarized. But there's another side to Turnitin: The service promotes itself as a way to help teach students how to avoid plagiarism. I argue that the use of plagiarism detection services as learning tools actually contributes to the problem of plagiarism, by encouraging the idea that original papers are the goal of a class, instead of instruments to assess a student's ability to understand the class material. In addition, giving students access to the very tool that professors use to evaluate the authenticity of a paper allows students to use the tool to intentionally plagiarize in a way that passes the test. While plagiarism-detection services can help professors investigate suspected acts of plagiarism, they should not be used as a tool to teach students how to write papers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Teaching Ethics is the property of Philosophy Documentation Center and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
Be the first to leave a comment!
