View in EDS

Institutional Injustice: How Public Administration Has Fostered and Can Ameliorate Racial Disparities.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Institutional Injustice: How Public Administration Has Fostered and Can Ameliorate Racial Disparities.
Authors: House-Niamke, Stephanie1 (AUTHOR), Eckerd, Adam2 (AUTHOR) aeckerd@iu.edu
Source: Administration & Society. Feb2021, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p305-324. 20p.
Subject Terms: Racial inequality, Public administration, Justice, Critical race theory
Abstract: In a culture with institutionalized racial disparities, administrative norms that attempt to ensure rational decisions through the use of aggregation and quantification can exacerbate the racial disparities that policy attempts to address. We argue that it will be difficult for policy to address the problem without a fundamental reorientation of the ways that administrators make decisions based on race. We conclude by offering some suggestions for how this reorientation can begin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Administration & Society is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 148659652
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Institutional Injustice: How Public Administration Has Fostered and Can Ameliorate Racial Disparities.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22House-Niamke%2C+Stephanie%22">House-Niamke, Stephanie</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eckerd%2C+Adam%22">Eckerd, Adam</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> aeckerd@iu.edu</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Administration+%26+Society%22">Administration & Society</searchLink>. Feb2021, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p305-324. 20p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+inequality%22">Racial inequality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+administration%22">Public administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Justice%22">Justice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Critical+race+theory%22">Critical race theory</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: In a culture with institutionalized racial disparities, administrative norms that attempt to ensure rational decisions through the use of aggregation and quantification can exacerbate the racial disparities that policy attempts to address. We argue that it will be difficult for policy to address the problem without a fundamental reorientation of the ways that administrators make decisions based on race. We conclude by offering some suggestions for how this reorientation can begin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Administration & Society is the property of Sage Publications Inc. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=148659652
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/0095399720979182
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 305
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Racial inequality
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public administration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Justice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Critical race theory
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Institutional Injustice: How Public Administration Has Fostered and Can Ameliorate Racial Disparities.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: House-Niamke, Stephanie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Eckerd, Adam
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 02
              Text: Feb2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 00953997
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 53
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Administration & Society
              Type: main
ResultId 1