Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community.
Saved in:
| Title: | Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Secules, Stephen1 (AUTHOR) ssecules@fiu.edu, McCall, Cassandra2 (AUTHOR) cassandra.mccall@usu.edu, Mejia, Joel Alejandro3 (AUTHOR) jmejia@sandiego.edu, Beebe, Chanel4 (AUTHOR) beebe@purdue.edu, Masters, Adam S.5 (AUTHOR) masters1@vt.edu, L. Sánchez‐Peña, Matilde6 (AUTHOR) matildes@buffalo.edu, Svyantek, Martina5 (AUTHOR) svyantek@vt.edu |
| Source: | Journal of Engineering Education. Jan2021, Vol. 110 Issue 1, p19-43. 25p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Community of inquiry, *Group identity, *Engineering education, Researcher positionality, Demographic research |
| Abstract: | Background: Many engineering education researchers acknowledge that their positionality impacts their research. Practices for reporting positionality vary widely and rarely incorporate a nuanced discussion of the impact of demographic identities on research. Researchers holding marginalized or relatively hidden identities must navigate additional layers regarding transparency of their positionality. Purpose We identify ways in which positionality impacts research, with a particular emphasis on demographic identity dimensions. We note that whether identities are relatively marginalized, privileged, hidden, or apparent in a research context creates complexities for conceptualizing, practicing, and disclosing one's positionality. Method: In a collaborative inquiry informed by autoethnography, we assemble positionality reflections of current engineering education researchers to demonstrate the primary ways in which positionality impacts research. Results: We find that positionality impacts six fundamental aspects of research: research topic, epistemology, ontology, methodology, relation to participants, and communication. These aspects of research delve deeper than conceptions of positionality as a methodological limitation, a measure to prevent bias, or a requirement for research quality. Conclusion: The impact of positionality on research is complex, particularly when researchers occupy minoritized identities and for research topics that interrogate power relations between identity groups. By demonstrating the practices of interrogating and representing positionality, we hope to encourage more researchers to represent positionality transparently, thus making researchers' transparency safer for all. We argue that positionality is an important tool for reflecting on and dislocating privilege, particularly when working on equity research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 148778241 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Secules%2C+Stephen%22">Secules, Stephen</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> ssecules@fiu.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McCall%2C+Cassandra%22">McCall, Cassandra</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> cassandra.mccall@usu.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mejia%2C+Joel+Alejandro%22">Mejia, Joel Alejandro</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> jmejia@sandiego.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Beebe%2C+Chanel%22">Beebe, Chanel</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> beebe@purdue.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Masters%2C+Adam+S%2E%22">Masters, Adam S.</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> masters1@vt.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22L%2E+Sánchez‐Peña%2C+Matilde%22">L. Sánchez‐Peña, Matilde</searchLink><relatesTo>6</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> matildes@buffalo.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Svyantek%2C+Martina%22">Svyantek, Martina</searchLink><relatesTo>5</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> svyantek@vt.edu</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Engineering+Education%22">Journal of Engineering Education</searchLink>. Jan2021, Vol. 110 Issue 1, p19-43. 25p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+of+inquiry%22">Community of inquiry</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+identity%22">Group identity</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+education%22">Engineering education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Researcher+positionality%22">Researcher positionality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Demographic+research%22">Demographic research</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Many engineering education researchers acknowledge that their positionality impacts their research. Practices for reporting positionality vary widely and rarely incorporate a nuanced discussion of the impact of demographic identities on research. Researchers holding marginalized or relatively hidden identities must navigate additional layers regarding transparency of their positionality. Purpose We identify ways in which positionality impacts research, with a particular emphasis on demographic identity dimensions. We note that whether identities are relatively marginalized, privileged, hidden, or apparent in a research context creates complexities for conceptualizing, practicing, and disclosing one's positionality. Method: In a collaborative inquiry informed by autoethnography, we assemble positionality reflections of current engineering education researchers to demonstrate the primary ways in which positionality impacts research. Results: We find that positionality impacts six fundamental aspects of research: research topic, epistemology, ontology, methodology, relation to participants, and communication. These aspects of research delve deeper than conceptions of positionality as a methodological limitation, a measure to prevent bias, or a requirement for research quality. Conclusion: The impact of positionality on research is complex, particularly when researchers occupy minoritized identities and for research topics that interrogate power relations between identity groups. By demonstrating the practices of interrogating and representing positionality, we hope to encourage more researchers to represent positionality transparently, thus making researchers' transparency safer for all. We argue that positionality is an important tool for reflecting on and dislocating privilege, particularly when working on equity research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Engineering Education is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=148778241 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/jee.20377 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 StartPage: 19 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Community of inquiry Type: general – SubjectFull: Group identity Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering education Type: general – SubjectFull: Researcher positionality Type: general – SubjectFull: Demographic research Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Positionality practices and dimensions of impact on equity research: A collaborative inquiry and call to the community. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Secules, Stephen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McCall, Cassandra – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mejia, Joel Alejandro – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Beebe, Chanel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Masters, Adam S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: L. Sánchez‐Peña, Matilde – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Svyantek, Martina IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Text: Jan2021 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 10694730 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 110 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Engineering Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
