Peer Ostracism as a Sanction Against Wrongdoers and Whistleblowers.
Saved in:
| Title: | Peer Ostracism as a Sanction Against Wrongdoers and Whistleblowers. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Curtis, Mary B.1 (AUTHOR) mary.curtis@unt.edu, Robertson, Jesse C.1 (AUTHOR), Cockrell, R. Cameron2 (AUTHOR), Fayard, L. Dutch3 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Journal of Business Ethics. Nov2021, Vol. 174 Issue 2, p333-354. 22p. 3 Diagrams, 6 Charts. |
| Subject Terms: | *Social norms, Whistleblowers, Social isolation, Peers, Whistleblowing |
| Abstract: | Retaliation against whistleblowers is a well-recognized problem, yet there is little explanation for why uninvolved peers choose to retaliate through ostracism. We conduct two experiments in which participants take the role of a peer third-party observer of theft and subsequent whistleblowing. We manipulate injunctive norms (whether company policy is ambiguous or unambiguous regarding the action) and descriptive norms (whether others behave similarly). Both experiments (1) support the core of our theoretical model, based on social intuitionist theory (Haidt in Psychol Rev 108:814–834, 2001), such that moral judgments of the acts of wrongdoing and whistleblowing influence the perceived likeability of each actor and ultimately influence intention to ostracize each actor and (2) indicate more willingness to ostracize the whistleblower than the wrongdoer. When we vary norms for the wrongdoing in Experiment 1, we find that descriptive and injunctive norms indirectly influence intentions to ostracize both the wrongdoer and whistleblower. These relationships are serially mediated by the observers' moral judgments of the act (wrongdoing or whistleblowing) and likeability of the actor (wrongdoer or whistleblower). When we vary norms for whistleblowing in Experiment 2, the injunctive norm manipulation affected moral judgment of the action of whistleblowing, and we do not observe any other significant effects of the norm manipulations on moral judgments of the actions of wrongdoing or whistleblowing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 153455177 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Peer Ostracism as a Sanction Against Wrongdoers and Whistleblowers. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Curtis%2C+Mary+B%2E%22">Curtis, Mary B.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> mary.curtis@unt.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Robertson%2C+Jesse+C%2E%22">Robertson, Jesse C.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cockrell%2C+R%2E+Cameron%22">Cockrell, R. Cameron</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fayard%2C+L%2E+Dutch%22">Fayard, L. Dutch</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Business+Ethics%22">Journal of Business Ethics</searchLink>. Nov2021, Vol. 174 Issue 2, p333-354. 22p. 3 Diagrams, 6 Charts. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+norms%22">Social norms</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Whistleblowers%22">Whistleblowers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+isolation%22">Social isolation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peers%22">Peers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Whistleblowing%22">Whistleblowing</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Retaliation against whistleblowers is a well-recognized problem, yet there is little explanation for why uninvolved peers choose to retaliate through ostracism. We conduct two experiments in which participants take the role of a peer third-party observer of theft and subsequent whistleblowing. We manipulate injunctive norms (whether company policy is ambiguous or unambiguous regarding the action) and descriptive norms (whether others behave similarly). Both experiments (1) support the core of our theoretical model, based on social intuitionist theory (Haidt in Psychol Rev 108:814–834, 2001), such that moral judgments of the acts of wrongdoing and whistleblowing influence the perceived likeability of each actor and ultimately influence intention to ostracize each actor and (2) indicate more willingness to ostracize the whistleblower than the wrongdoer. When we vary norms for the wrongdoing in Experiment 1, we find that descriptive and injunctive norms indirectly influence intentions to ostracize both the wrongdoer and whistleblower. These relationships are serially mediated by the observers' moral judgments of the act (wrongdoing or whistleblowing) and likeability of the actor (wrongdoer or whistleblower). When we vary norms for whistleblowing in Experiment 2, the injunctive norm manipulation affected moral judgment of the action of whistleblowing, and we do not observe any other significant effects of the norm manipulations on moral judgments of the actions of wrongdoing or whistleblowing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Business Ethics is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=153455177 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10551-020-04596-0 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 22 StartPage: 333 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Social norms Type: general – SubjectFull: Whistleblowers Type: general – SubjectFull: Social isolation Type: general – SubjectFull: Peers Type: general – SubjectFull: Whistleblowing Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Peer Ostracism as a Sanction Against Wrongdoers and Whistleblowers. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Curtis, Mary B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Robertson, Jesse C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cockrell, R. Cameron – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fayard, L. Dutch IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 16 M: 11 Text: Nov2021 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 01674544 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 174 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Business Ethics Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
