The authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter?
Saved in:
| Title: | The authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter? |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Arianto, M. Affandi1 affandia@fbs.unp.ac.id, Basthomi, Yazid2 |
| Source: | Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies. 2021, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p1743-1759. 17p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Authors, British authors, English language, Automobiles, Space research |
| Abstract: | Swales’ (1990) Creating a Research Space (CARS) model has spawned a large number of studies focusing on investigations of research article introductions (RAIs), and the reports have given meaningful contributions to guide novice and non-native authors in writing English RAIs. However, the investigation of authors’ research gap strategies in RAIs has so far received little attention. Also, the previous investigations do not account for the way such strategies are applied across the Scopus journal quartiles (i.e., Q1, Q2, Q3, & Q4). Therefore, this study is undertaken to investigate the research gap strategies used by authors who published their research articles (RAs) in Scopus-indexed journals. The strategies found were, then, compared seen from the Scopus journal quartile lens. Forty RAs from eight Scopus-indexed journals in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT) were randomly collected and analyzed using Swales’ (1990) framework, taking into account the insights proposed by Lim (2012) and Kwan, Chan, and Lam (2012). The findings reveal that the authors use five research gap strategies to present their research gaps in their ELT RAIs. The comparative analysis shows that there are differences and similarities in using research gap strategies across the quartiles. The findings of this study can assist non-native and novice authors to achieve visibility worldwide by giving closer attention to how to present research gaps using several research gap strategies in RAIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies is the property of Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 153587887 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter? – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Arianto%2C+M%2E+Affandi%22">Arianto, M. Affandi</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> affandia@fbs.unp.ac.id</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Basthomi%2C+Yazid%22">Basthomi, Yazid</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Language+%26+Linguistics+Studies%22">Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies</searchLink>. 2021, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p1743-1759. 17p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Authors%22">Authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22British+authors%22">British authors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+language%22">English language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Automobiles%22">Automobiles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Space+research%22">Space research</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Swales’ (1990) Creating a Research Space (CARS) model has spawned a large number of studies focusing on investigations of research article introductions (RAIs), and the reports have given meaningful contributions to guide novice and non-native authors in writing English RAIs. However, the investigation of authors’ research gap strategies in RAIs has so far received little attention. Also, the previous investigations do not account for the way such strategies are applied across the Scopus journal quartiles (i.e., Q1, Q2, Q3, & Q4). Therefore, this study is undertaken to investigate the research gap strategies used by authors who published their research articles (RAs) in Scopus-indexed journals. The strategies found were, then, compared seen from the Scopus journal quartile lens. Forty RAs from eight Scopus-indexed journals in the field of English Language Teaching (ELT) were randomly collected and analyzed using Swales’ (1990) framework, taking into account the insights proposed by Lim (2012) and Kwan, Chan, and Lam (2012). The findings reveal that the authors use five research gap strategies to present their research gaps in their ELT RAIs. The comparative analysis shows that there are differences and similarities in using research gap strategies across the quartiles. The findings of this study can assist non-native and novice authors to achieve visibility worldwide by giving closer attention to how to present research gaps using several research gap strategies in RAIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies is the property of Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=153587887 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.52462/jlls.127 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 1743 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Authors Type: general – SubjectFull: British authors Type: general – SubjectFull: English language Type: general – SubjectFull: Automobiles Type: general – SubjectFull: Space research Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The authors’ research gap strategies in ELT research article introductions: Does Scopus journal quartile matter? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Arianto, M. Affandi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Basthomi, Yazid IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: 2021 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1305578X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 17 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Language & Linguistics Studies Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |