View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Coproducing clinical curricula in undergraduate medical education: Student and faculty experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Coproducing clinical curricula in undergraduate medical education: Student and faculty experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships.
Authors: Gheihman, Galina1, Callahan, Dana G.2, Onyango, Joshua3, Gooding, Holly C.4, Hirsh, David A.5,6
Source: Medical Teacher. Nov 2021, Vol. 43 Issue 11, p1267-1277. 11p.
Subject Terms: *Research methodology, *College teacher attitudes, *Undergraduates, *Experience, *Qualitative research, *Medical schools, *Curriculum planning, *Student attitudes, *Medical education, *Longitudinal method, Interviewing, Surveys
Abstract: Educational coproduction, in which learners partner with educators to create and improve their educational experiences, can facilitate student-centered medical education. Empirical descriptions of best practices for involving students in clinical curricular coproduction are needed. We aimed to understand faculty and student perspectives on methods, perceived benefits, and common barriers and solutions to clinical curricular coproduction. We conducted an international mixed-methods study of clinical curricular coproduction in undergraduate medical education and longitudinal integrated clerkships specifically. Faculty and students identified through an international listserv received an electronic survey to identify methods, benefits, and challenges of clinical curricular coproduction. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a subset of survey participants. We present descriptive statistics for survey data and themes derived from inductive qualitative analysis. Two hundred forty-seven individuals (104 faculty; 143 students) representing 52 medical schools in eight countries completed the survey. Methods for clinical curricular coproduction ranged from informal, low-intensity learner involvement (e.g. verbal feedback) to formal, high-intensity learner involvement (e.g. committee membership). Perceived benefits included improvements in student-faculty relationships, program culture and design, and student development. Structural issues (e.g. scheduling) were the most common perceived barriers. Clinical curricular coproduction among faculty and students is perceived to enhance collaboration, enable curriculum change, and support students' professional development. Our study offers empirical guidance for involving students as partners in clinical curricular coproduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 154077759
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Coproducing clinical curricula in undergraduate medical education: Student and faculty experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gheihman%2C+Galina%22">Gheihman, Galina</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Callahan%2C+Dana+G%2E%22">Callahan, Dana G.</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Onyango%2C+Joshua%22">Onyango, Joshua</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gooding%2C+Holly+C%2E%22">Gooding, Holly C.</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hirsh%2C+David+A%2E%22">Hirsh, David A.</searchLink><relatesTo>5,6</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. Nov 2021, Vol. 43 Issue 11, p1267-1277. 11p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+methodology%22">Research methodology</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+teacher+attitudes%22">College teacher attitudes</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduates%22">Undergraduates</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experience%22">Experience</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualitative+research%22">Qualitative research</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+schools%22">Medical schools</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+planning%22">Curriculum planning</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+attitudes%22">Student attitudes</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+education%22">Medical education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+method%22">Longitudinal method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interviewing%22">Interviewing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Educational coproduction, in which learners partner with educators to create and improve their educational experiences, can facilitate student-centered medical education. Empirical descriptions of best practices for involving students in clinical curricular coproduction are needed. We aimed to understand faculty and student perspectives on methods, perceived benefits, and common barriers and solutions to clinical curricular coproduction. We conducted an international mixed-methods study of clinical curricular coproduction in undergraduate medical education and longitudinal integrated clerkships specifically. Faculty and students identified through an international listserv received an electronic survey to identify methods, benefits, and challenges of clinical curricular coproduction. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a subset of survey participants. We present descriptive statistics for survey data and themes derived from inductive qualitative analysis. Two hundred forty-seven individuals (104 faculty; 143 students) representing 52 medical schools in eight countries completed the survey. Methods for clinical curricular coproduction ranged from informal, low-intensity learner involvement (e.g. verbal feedback) to formal, high-intensity learner involvement (e.g. committee membership). Perceived benefits included improvements in student-faculty relationships, program culture and design, and student development. Structural issues (e.g. scheduling) were the most common perceived barriers. Clinical curricular coproduction among faculty and students is perceived to enhance collaboration, enable curriculum change, and support students' professional development. Our study offers empirical guidance for involving students as partners in clinical curricular coproduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=154077759
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1935825
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 11
        StartPage: 1267
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Research methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College teacher attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduates
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Experience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualitative research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum planning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Medical education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal method
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interviewing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Coproducing clinical curricula in undergraduate medical education: Student and faculty experiences in longitudinal integrated clerkships.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gheihman, Galina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Callahan, Dana G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Onyango, Joshua
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gooding, Holly C.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hirsh, David A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov 2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0142159X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 43
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Medical Teacher
              Type: main
ResultId 1