Commentary: The Questions We Should Be Asking About Socially Responsible College Admission Testing.
Saved in:
| Title: | Commentary: The Questions We Should Be Asking About Socially Responsible College Admission Testing. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Klugman, Emma M.1 (AUTHOR) eklugman@g.harvard.edu, An, Lily1 (AUTHOR), Himmelsbach, Zachary1 (AUTHOR), Litschwartz, Sophie L.1 (AUTHOR), Nicola, Tara P.1 (AUTHOR) |
| Source: | Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice. Dec2021, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p28-31. 4p. |
| Subject Terms: | *University & college admission, *Educational tests & measurements, *Education policy, *Letters of recommendation (Education), Social responsibility of business, Social responsibility |
| Abstract: | A college admission test may also be tutored, but it is very rare that someone besides the student took the test, or that the student was able to access help during the test. Without these stakeholders putting pressure on testing agencies, testing companies will not be incentivized to reimagine their role in how test scores are utilized or otherwise address the societal inequities their tests may perpetuate. Testing agencies are not incentivized to change if their primary consumers continue to rely on tests as part of their admission processes: as long as colleges accept test scores, students will continue to take the tests. Keywords: college admission; high-stakes tests; corporate social responsibility; testing industry EN college admission high-stakes tests corporate social responsibility testing industry 28 31 4 12/28/21 20211201 NES 211201 The issue of what role testing agencies should play in facilitating the socially responsible use of their college admission tests is an important one. [Extracted from the article] |
| Copyright of Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 154315111 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Commentary: The Questions We Should Be Asking About Socially Responsible College Admission Testing. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klugman%2C+Emma+M%2E%22">Klugman, Emma M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<i> eklugman@g.harvard.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22An%2C+Lily%22">An, Lily</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Himmelsbach%2C+Zachary%22">Himmelsbach, Zachary</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Litschwartz%2C+Sophie+L%2E%22">Litschwartz, Sophie L.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nicola%2C+Tara+P%2E%22">Nicola, Tara P.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo> (AUTHOR) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Educational+Measurement%3A+Issues+%26+Practice%22">Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice</searchLink>. Dec2021, Vol. 40 Issue 4, p28-31. 4p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22University+%26+college+admission%22">University & college admission</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+tests+%26+measurements%22">Educational tests & measurements</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Education+policy%22">Education policy</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Letters+of+recommendation+%28Education%29%22">Letters of recommendation (Education)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+responsibility+of+business%22">Social responsibility of business</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+responsibility%22">Social responsibility</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: A college admission test may also be tutored, but it is very rare that someone besides the student took the test, or that the student was able to access help during the test. Without these stakeholders putting pressure on testing agencies, testing companies will not be incentivized to reimagine their role in how test scores are utilized or otherwise address the societal inequities their tests may perpetuate. Testing agencies are not incentivized to change if their primary consumers continue to rely on tests as part of their admission processes: as long as colleges accept test scores, students will continue to take the tests. Keywords: college admission; high-stakes tests; corporate social responsibility; testing industry EN college admission high-stakes tests corporate social responsibility testing industry 28 31 4 12/28/21 20211201 NES 211201 The issue of what role testing agencies should play in facilitating the socially responsible use of their college admission tests is an important one. [Extracted from the article] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=154315111 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/emip.12449 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 4 StartPage: 28 Subjects: – SubjectFull: University & college admission Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational tests & measurements Type: general – SubjectFull: Education policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Letters of recommendation (Education) Type: general – SubjectFull: Social responsibility of business Type: general – SubjectFull: Social responsibility Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Commentary: The Questions We Should Be Asking About Socially Responsible College Admission Testing. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Klugman, Emma M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: An, Lily – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Himmelsbach, Zachary – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Litschwartz, Sophie L. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nicola, Tara P. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Text: Dec2021 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 07311745 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 40 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Educational Measurement: Issues & Practice Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |