대학영어 배치고사로서의 CEFR 기반 CELA 와 TOEIC 비교 연구.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: 대학영어 배치고사로서의 CEFR 기반 CELA 와 TOEIC 비교 연구.
Alternate Title: A comparison of TOEIC and CEFR based CELA as a college English placement test.
Authors: 강경민1 kelly.kyungmin@gmail.com
Source: English Teaching. Winter2021, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p123-141. 19p.
Subject Terms: *College freshmen, *Test scoring, *College teachers, *Curriculum, Acquisition of data
Abstract: This study aims to examine whether CEFR-based CELA can be presented as a placement test for TOEIC. Data collected from 1,142 college freshmen who participated in both tests were analyzed to determine: 1) how hypothetical levels of a CELA score differed from existing TOEIC levels; 2) if there was any significant correlation between test scores and final grades; and 3) how native English professors viewed CELA as a placement test. The analysis revealed that CELA did not perform better a placement test than TOEIC. It did not have a higher correlation with the final grade either. However, the fact that CELA is more aligned with the content and objective of the English course and that most native English professors consider CELA more suitable as a placement test can be seen as positive factors supporting it to replace the existing placement test. Results of this study if curriculum and student levels are different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of English Teaching is the property of Korea Association of Teachers of English and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 154450701
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: 대학영어 배치고사로서의 CEFR 기반 CELA 와 TOEIC 비교 연구.
– Name: TitleAlt
  Label: Alternate Title
  Group: TiAlt
  Data: A comparison of TOEIC and CEFR based CELA as a college English placement test.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22강경민%22">강경민</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> kelly.kyungmin@gmail.com</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22English+Teaching%22">English Teaching</searchLink>. Winter2021, Vol. 76 Issue 4, p123-141. 19p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+freshmen%22">College freshmen</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+scoring%22">Test scoring</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+teachers%22">College teachers</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Acquisition+of+data%22">Acquisition of data</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study aims to examine whether CEFR-based CELA can be presented as a placement test for TOEIC. Data collected from 1,142 college freshmen who participated in both tests were analyzed to determine: 1) how hypothetical levels of a CELA score differed from existing TOEIC levels; 2) if there was any significant correlation between test scores and final grades; and 3) how native English professors viewed CELA as a placement test. The analysis revealed that CELA did not perform better a placement test than TOEIC. It did not have a higher correlation with the final grade either. However, the fact that CELA is more aligned with the content and objective of the English course and that most native English professors consider CELA more suitable as a placement test can be seen as positive factors supporting it to replace the existing placement test. Results of this study if curriculum and student levels are different. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of English Teaching is the property of Korea Association of Teachers of English and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=154450701
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.15858/engtea.76.4.202112.123
    Languages:
      – Code: kor
        Text: Korean
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 123
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: College freshmen
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test scoring
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Acquisition of data
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: 대학영어 배치고사로서의 CEFR 기반 CELA 와 TOEIC 비교 연구.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: 강경민
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Text: Winter2021
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10177108
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 76
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: English Teaching
              Type: main
ResultId 1