Assisted self‐assessment to optimize the OPIc test experience.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Assisted self‐assessment to optimize the OPIc test experience.
Authors: Spino, LeAnne L.1 spino@uri.edu, Echevarría, Megan M.1, Wu, Yu1
Source: Foreign Language Annals. Sep2022, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p853-876. 24p.
Subject Terms: *Classical languages, *Modern languages, *Classical literature, Modern literature
Company/Entity: University of Rhode Island
Abstract: The Challenge: A principal adaptive feature of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview—computer (OPIc) is a self‐assessment instrument through which test takers select a level‐appropriate test form. How accurately do test takers select level‐appropriate forms on the OPIc? Would assistance with the test form selection process optimize the testing experience? The ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview—computer (OPIc) employs a self‐assessment instrument to determine the nature of the speaking prompts to which the test taker will respond and, thus the difficulty of the test. Grounded in research demonstrating varying levels of accuracy in self‐assessment among language learners, this study examines the accuracy of test takers' autonomous selection of appropriate OPIc forms and investigates strategies for maximizing level‐appropriate form selection. Chinese, German, and Spanish language learners (n = 101) completed three different self‐assessments before taking the OPIc. Self‐assessment results across the three tools were then compared to the OPIc ratings ultimately achieved by the learners. Although accuracy in the selection of level‐appropriate OPIc forms was generally quite high, success rates were higher with a global 10‐point self‐assessment instrument. These findings suggest that test takers may benefit from the assistance of a global 10‐point scale in the OPIc form selection process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Foreign Language Annals is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 159063440
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Assisted self‐assessment to optimize the OPIc test experience.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Spino%2C+LeAnne+L%2E%22">Spino, LeAnne L.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> spino@uri.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Echevarría%2C+Megan+M%2E%22">Echevarría, Megan M.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wu%2C+Yu%22">Wu, Yu</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Foreign+Language+Annals%22">Foreign Language Annals</searchLink>. Sep2022, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p853-876. 24p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classical+languages%22">Classical languages</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Modern+languages%22">Modern languages</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classical+literature%22">Classical literature</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Modern+literature%22">Modern literature</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectCompany
  Label: Company/Entity
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22University+of+Rhode+Island%22">University of Rhode Island</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The Challenge: A principal adaptive feature of the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview—computer (OPIc) is a self‐assessment instrument through which test takers select a level‐appropriate test form. How accurately do test takers select level‐appropriate forms on the OPIc? Would assistance with the test form selection process optimize the testing experience? The ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview—computer (OPIc) employs a self‐assessment instrument to determine the nature of the speaking prompts to which the test taker will respond and, thus the difficulty of the test. Grounded in research demonstrating varying levels of accuracy in self‐assessment among language learners, this study examines the accuracy of test takers' autonomous selection of appropriate OPIc forms and investigates strategies for maximizing level‐appropriate form selection. Chinese, German, and Spanish language learners (n = 101) completed three different self‐assessments before taking the OPIc. Self‐assessment results across the three tools were then compared to the OPIc ratings ultimately achieved by the learners. Although accuracy in the selection of level‐appropriate OPIc forms was generally quite high, success rates were higher with a global 10‐point self‐assessment instrument. These findings suggest that test takers may benefit from the assistance of a global 10‐point scale in the OPIc form selection process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Foreign Language Annals is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=159063440
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/flan.12645
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 24
        StartPage: 853
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Classical languages
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Modern languages
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Classical literature
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Modern literature
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: University of Rhode Island
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Assisted self‐assessment to optimize the OPIc test experience.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Spino, LeAnne L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Echevarría, Megan M.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Wu, Yu
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Text: Sep2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0015718X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 55
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Foreign Language Annals
              Type: main
ResultId 1