Research and academic output evaluation for career initiation or progression: Critical issues for Health Professionals.
Saved in:
| Title: | Research and academic output evaluation for career initiation or progression: Critical issues for Health Professionals. |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Kumar, Neeta1, Gupta, Ruchika2, Gupta, Sanjay2 sanjaydr17@gmail.com |
| Source: | Medical Teacher. Oct2022, Vol. 44 Issue 10, p1179-1181. 3p. |
| Subject Terms: | *Vocational guidance, *Professional employee training, *Bibliometrics, *Employee recruitment, *Academic achievement, Attitudes of medical personnel, Medical research |
| Abstract: | In current times, much stress is being laid on the evaluation of research productivity of researchers or faculty in addition to the academic qualifications and experience for the purposes of recruitment, promotion, and research grant funding. Over the years, several quantitative indices have been devised for this purpose. Some of these indices such as h-index, impact factor and e-index are being extensively used by research organizations, universities, accreditation bodies and funding agencies for basic scientists as well as health professionals. In the absence of any formal training, these parameters or their advantages and shortcomings may not be well understood by the health professionals, especially in the early stages of their careers and sometimes, even by the evaluators. A big unanswered question is the validity of the same criteria for health professionals as are applicable for the basic science researchers. Since health professional undertaking research assignments are neither adequately trained in basic research nor can they comprehend these indices well, the same yardstick to evaluate these two widely different groups of researchers often places the health professionals at a disadvantage. This paper aims to highlight certain vital issues related to the application of research productivity indicators for recruitment and career progression of health care professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
| Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) | |
| Database: | Education Research Complete |
|
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Login for full access.
|
|
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Text: Availability: 1 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: ehh DbLabel: Education Research Complete An: 159584617 AccessLevel: 6 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Research and academic output evaluation for career initiation or progression: Critical issues for Health Professionals. – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kumar%2C+Neeta%22">Kumar, Neeta</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gupta%2C+Ruchika%22">Gupta, Ruchika</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gupta%2C+Sanjay%22">Gupta, Sanjay</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><i> sanjaydr17@gmail.com</i> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Medical+Teacher%22">Medical Teacher</searchLink>. Oct2022, Vol. 44 Issue 10, p1179-1181. 3p. – Name: Subject Label: Subject Terms Group: Su Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocational+guidance%22">Vocational guidance</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Professional+employee+training%22">Professional employee training</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bibliometrics%22">Bibliometrics</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+recruitment%22">Employee recruitment</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+achievement%22">Academic achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes+of+medical+personnel%22">Attitudes of medical personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+research%22">Medical research</searchLink> – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: In current times, much stress is being laid on the evaluation of research productivity of researchers or faculty in addition to the academic qualifications and experience for the purposes of recruitment, promotion, and research grant funding. Over the years, several quantitative indices have been devised for this purpose. Some of these indices such as h-index, impact factor and e-index are being extensively used by research organizations, universities, accreditation bodies and funding agencies for basic scientists as well as health professionals. In the absence of any formal training, these parameters or their advantages and shortcomings may not be well understood by the health professionals, especially in the early stages of their careers and sometimes, even by the evaluators. A big unanswered question is the validity of the same criteria for health professionals as are applicable for the basic science researchers. Since health professional undertaking research assignments are neither adequately trained in basic research nor can they comprehend these indices well, the same yardstick to evaluate these two widely different groups of researchers often places the health professionals at a disadvantage. This paper aims to highlight certain vital issues related to the application of research productivity indicators for recruitment and career progression of health care professionals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] – Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright Label: Group: Ab Data: <i>Copyright of Medical Teacher is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=159584617 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2102471 Languages: – Code: eng Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 3 StartPage: 1179 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Vocational guidance Type: general – SubjectFull: Professional employee training Type: general – SubjectFull: Bibliometrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Employee recruitment Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitudes of medical personnel Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical research Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Research and academic output evaluation for career initiation or progression: Critical issues for Health Professionals. Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kumar, Neeta – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gupta, Ruchika – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gupta, Sanjay IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Text: Oct2022 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0142159X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 44 – Type: issue Value: 10 Titles: – TitleFull: Medical Teacher Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
