View in EDS PDF Full Text

Conversation as an Outcome of Aphasia Treatment: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Conversation as an Outcome of Aphasia Treatment: A Systematic Scoping Review.
Authors: Azios, Jamie H.1 jamie.azios@louisiana.edu, Archer, Brent2, Simmons-Mackie, Nina3, Raymer, Anastasia4, Carragher, Marcella5,6, Shashikanth, Shriya1, Gulick, Eleanor2
Source: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. Nov2022, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p2920-2942. 23p.
Subject Terms: *Conversation, *Aphasia, CINAHL database, Psychology information storage & retrieval systems, Online information services, Systematic reviews, Treatment effectiveness, MEDLINE
Abstract: Purpose: Conversation-focused speech-language pathology services are a top priority for people living with aphasia, but little is known about how researchers measure conversation as an outcome of treatment. This scoping review was undertaken to systematically review the evidence regarding the measurement of conversation in aphasia studies and to identify current practices and existing gaps. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between January 1995 and September 2019 in multiple electronic databases. Covidence software was used to manage search results, study selection, and data charting processes. Data were extracted from each study and then collated and organized to elucidate the breadth of approaches, tools, or procedures oriented to measuring conversation as an outcome and identify gaps in the existing literature. Results: The systematic search of the literature resulted in 1,244 studies. A total of 64 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The review summarizes the various tools and procedures used to measure conversation as an outcome of aphasia intervention, including variations in data collection and analysis procedures. The review also evaluates the quality of conversation measures in terms of psychometric properties and informal measures of validity. There was a total of 211 measures used across the 64 studies. Conclusions: While there was no clear measure that was objectively superior, several measures show promise and warrant future exploration. Some of the orientations, conceptualizations, and procedures we have presented can be seen as options that might be included in a future conversation-focused core outcome set. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 160296171
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Conversation as an Outcome of Aphasia Treatment: A Systematic Scoping Review.
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Azios%2C+Jamie+H%2E%22">Azios, Jamie H.</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> jamie.azios@louisiana.edu</i><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Archer%2C+Brent%22">Archer, Brent</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Simmons-Mackie%2C+Nina%22">Simmons-Mackie, Nina</searchLink><relatesTo>3</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Raymer%2C+Anastasia%22">Raymer, Anastasia</searchLink><relatesTo>4</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Carragher%2C+Marcella%22">Carragher, Marcella</searchLink><relatesTo>5,6</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shashikanth%2C+Shriya%22">Shashikanth, Shriya</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gulick%2C+Eleanor%22">Gulick, Eleanor</searchLink><relatesTo>2</relatesTo>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22American+Journal+of+Speech-Language+Pathology%22">American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology</searchLink>. Nov2022, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p2920-2942. 23p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Conversation%22">Conversation</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aphasia%22">Aphasia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22CINAHL+database%22">CINAHL database</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Psychology+information+storage+%26+retrieval+systems%22">Psychology information storage & retrieval systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+information+services%22">Online information services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systematic+reviews%22">Systematic reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Treatment+effectiveness%22">Treatment effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MEDLINE%22">MEDLINE</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Purpose: Conversation-focused speech-language pathology services are a top priority for people living with aphasia, but little is known about how researchers measure conversation as an outcome of treatment. This scoping review was undertaken to systematically review the evidence regarding the measurement of conversation in aphasia studies and to identify current practices and existing gaps. Method: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between January 1995 and September 2019 in multiple electronic databases. Covidence software was used to manage search results, study selection, and data charting processes. Data were extracted from each study and then collated and organized to elucidate the breadth of approaches, tools, or procedures oriented to measuring conversation as an outcome and identify gaps in the existing literature. Results: The systematic search of the literature resulted in 1,244 studies. A total of 64 studies met inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The review summarizes the various tools and procedures used to measure conversation as an outcome of aphasia intervention, including variations in data collection and analysis procedures. The review also evaluates the quality of conversation measures in terms of psychometric properties and informal measures of validity. There was a total of 211 measures used across the 64 studies. Conclusions: While there was no clear measure that was objectively superior, several measures show promise and warrant future exploration. Some of the orientations, conceptualizations, and procedures we have presented can be seen as options that might be included in a future conversation-focused core outcome set. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=160296171
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00011
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 2920
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Conversation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Aphasia
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: CINAHL database
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Psychology information storage & retrieval systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Online information services
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Systematic reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Treatment effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: MEDLINE
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Conversation as an Outcome of Aphasia Treatment: A Systematic Scoping Review.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Azios, Jamie H.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Archer, Brent
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Simmons-Mackie, Nina
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Raymer, Anastasia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Carragher, Marcella
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shashikanth, Shriya
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gulick, Eleanor
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Text: Nov2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 10580360
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 31
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
              Type: main
ResultId 1