Alternative(s): Better or just different?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Alternative(s): Better or just different?
Authors: Engelmann, Sebastian1 Sebastian.engelmann@ph-karlsruhe.de
Source: Journal of Philosophy of Education. Aug2022, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p523-534. 12p.
Subject Terms: *Alternative education, *Progressive education, *Curriculum, *Back to basics (Education), *Criticism
Abstract: This paper aspires to show the often‐obscured structure of alternatives in education. Alternative education is generally understood as an umbrella term for educational thought and practice for and in schools differing from an assumed 'mainstream', where 'alternative' is often taken to mean 'better'. In many cases, 'mainstream' serves as an empty signifier that can be substituted by various forms of criticism. Just as progressive education is supposed to remedy all the ills of traditional education, alternative education is often positioned as a safe place to retreat to, away from the mainstream. I argue that this leads to a dichotomous structure. The mainstream, however, is not an empirical reality, for example, a specific form of curriculum, differentiation of different types of schooling, or anything else. 'Mainstream' serves as a generic critical reference point. My argument is developed through a series of historical discussions around alternative education explored through the lens of contemporary analysis of the category. I then offer a more systematic account of the terminology in order to establish a perspective from which to assess the flaws and problems of alternative education alongside its potential virtues and benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Copyright of Journal of Philosophy of Education is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
Database: Education Research Complete
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
Text:
  Availability: 1
Header DbId: ehh
DbLabel: Education Research Complete
An: 160352479
AccessLevel: 6
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Alternative(s): Better or just different?
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Engelmann%2C+Sebastian%22">Engelmann, Sebastian</searchLink><relatesTo>1</relatesTo><i> Sebastian.engelmann@ph-karlsruhe.de</i>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="JN" term="%22Journal+of+Philosophy+of+Education%22">Journal of Philosophy of Education</searchLink>. Aug2022, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p523-534. 12p.
– Name: Subject
  Label: Subject Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: *<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alternative+education%22">Alternative education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Progressive+education%22">Progressive education</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum%22">Curriculum</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Back+to+basics+%28Education%29%22">Back to basics (Education)</searchLink><br />*<searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Criticism%22">Criticism</searchLink>
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This paper aspires to show the often‐obscured structure of alternatives in education. Alternative education is generally understood as an umbrella term for educational thought and practice for and in schools differing from an assumed 'mainstream', where 'alternative' is often taken to mean 'better'. In many cases, 'mainstream' serves as an empty signifier that can be substituted by various forms of criticism. Just as progressive education is supposed to remedy all the ills of traditional education, alternative education is often positioned as a safe place to retreat to, away from the mainstream. I argue that this leads to a dichotomous structure. The mainstream, however, is not an empirical reality, for example, a specific form of curriculum, differentiation of different types of schooling, or anything else. 'Mainstream' serves as a generic critical reference point. My argument is developed through a series of historical discussions around alternative education explored through the lens of contemporary analysis of the category. I then offer a more systematic account of the terminology in order to establish a perspective from which to assess the flaws and problems of alternative education alongside its potential virtues and benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
– Name: AbstractSuppliedCopyright
  Label:
  Group: Ab
  Data: <i>Copyright of Journal of Philosophy of Education is the property of Oxford University Press / USA and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.</i> (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=ehh&AN=160352479
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/1467-9752.12702
    Languages:
      – Code: eng
        Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 523
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Alternative education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Progressive education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Back to basics (Education)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Criticism
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Alternative(s): Better or just different?
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Engelmann, Sebastian
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Text: Aug2022
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 03098249
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 56
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Philosophy of Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1